BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. FIELD OF THE INENTION
The present invention relates to magnetic circuits with opposing permanent
magnets, and specifically relates to magnetic circuits with opposing permanent magnets
suitable for magnetic resonance imaging apparatuses (also referred to MRI) which
obtain images of bodies by utilizing magnetic resonance.
2. DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART
For magnetic field generating devices using permanent magnets for
magnetic resonance imaging apparatuses, the use of magnetic circuits with opposing
permanent magnets utilizing rare earth magnets is well-established. As detailed
below, such magnet opposing-type magnetic circuits include permanent magnet units
and a yoke for allowing a magnetic flux from the magnets to pass therethrough, and
generally also include pole pieces that are preferably made of soft magnetic material
such as soft iron, provided on surfaces of the permanent magnet units in order to
generate a uniform magnetic field in the gap between the permanent magnet units.
Japanese Patent Provisional Publication No. 2000-51175 A, Japanese
Patent Provisional Publication No. H8-339916/1996 A, all of which are herein incorporated
by reference, and the like teach a method for assembling such magnetic circuits
with opposing permanent magnets. As disclosed in these documents, when assembling
magnetic circuits with opposing permanent magnets, a permanent magnet unit is arranged
on a base yoke in a plate-shaped, disk-shaped or the like, followed by arranging
a pole piece on an upper face of the permanent magnet unit.
Before the pole piece is arranged on the permanent magnet unit, the
permanent magnet is very susceptible to a self-generated magnetic field (demagnetization
field). Therefore, if the coercive force of the permanent magnet is weak, then magnetism
may be reduced due to the demagnetization field, resulting in reduction of the magnetic
field generated by the permanent magnet, and there is a possibility that the obtained
magnetic field will be less than the design value even after a pole piece is arranged.
Thus for the permanent magnet used in the magnetic circuit, it has been necessary
to use a permanent magnet whose coercive force is sufficiently high. However, special
materials and technologies are required for manufacturing a magnet having a high
coercive force. Nd2Fe14B-based rare earth magnets are used
as the permanent magnets for magnetic circuits with opposing permanent magnets currently
widely used. However, further adding elements such as Dy and Tb is required in order
to raise the coercive force of these magnets. The use of these added elements causes
an increase in the cost of the magnet, resulting in an increase in costs of the
magnetic circuit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to reduce the cost of the
magnet of magnetic circuits with opposing permanent magnets by ensuring that inexpensive
magnets having a low coercive force can be used without substantial loss of magnetism
caused by demagnetization fields.
There is provided a magnetic circuit with opposing permanent magnets,
comprising: a pair of permanent magnet units opposing each other across a gap, the
pair of permanent magnets being magnetized in thickness direction, wherein each
of the permanent magnet units comprises at least two types of permanent magnet pieces
with different coercive forces, and wherein, the permanent magnet piece that receives
the largest demagnetization force when the permanent magnet units are manufactured
has a larger coercive force than at least one other type of the permanent magnet
piece; a yoke magnetically coupled to the permanent magnet units, and provided outside
of the permanent magnet units and the gap; and a pair of pole pieces each arranged
on a gap side of an opposing surface of each of the permanent magnet units and having
a peripheral projection in opposing direction.
As described above, conventionally, magnets whose magnetism is not
reduced by an demagnetization field before the pole piece is arranged during assembly
of the magnetic circuit, namely magnets having high coercive forces, are used. However,
the strength of the demagnetization field is dependent on its position. For example,
in a disk-shape magnet, the demagnetization field is particularly strong at a position
in the vicinity of its center. Thus, the present inventors found that it is possible
to use a magnet having a high coercive force only in the region that receives a
strong demagnetization field, and to use a magnet having a small coercive force
in the other regions.
In this manner, the present invention defines the region which demands
a magnet having high coercive force, and an inexpensive magnet having a low coercive
force can be used in the other regions. Thus, it is possible to reduce the cost
of the magnet of the magnetic circuit without substantial reduction in magnetism
caused by demagnetization fields.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a permanent magnet opposing-type magnetic circuit,
according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing the high coercive force region and the low
coercive force region of the permanent magnet unit according to the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the relationship between the permanent magnet
piece and the high and low coercive force region.
DEATILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
An embodiment of the present invention is described below with reference
to the attached drawings. Naturally, the embodiment that is described below does
not limit the present invention.
FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a permanent magnet opposing-type
magnetic circuit, according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 1 shows
only the lower portion of the permanent magnet opposing-type magnetic circuit, since
generally, an upper portion and a lower portion of the permanent magnet opposing-type
magnetic circuit can be symmetrical. However, even if the upper and lower portions
are asymmetric, the present invention can be applied if the configuration is the
same. As shown in FIG. 1, a permanent magnet opposing-type magnetic circuit 1 according
to the present invention includes a pair of permanent magnet units 2 opposing each
other across a gap and magnetized in the thickness direction, a yoke 3 magnetically
coupled to the permanent magnet units and provided outside of the permanent magnet
units and the gap, and a pair of pole pieces 4 arranged on a gap side of an opposing
surface of each of the permanent magnet units and having a peripheral projection
in opposing direction.
As described above, a permanent magnet opposing-type magnetic circuit
1 according to the present invention includes a pair of permanent magnet units opposing
each other across a gap and magnetized in the thickness direction to form the principal
magnetic field in the gap. The direction of magnetization of the permanent magnet
units is substantially perpendicular to the faces of the opposing permanent magnet
units (thickness direction), and generally points in the same direction. The shape
of the permanent magnet units may be round or square, for example, and although
it is not a specific limitation, it is preferable that the permanent magnet units
have the same shape as the pole pieces.
Furthermore, as described above, the permanent magnet unit according
to the present invention comprises at least two types of permanent magnet pieces
with different coercive forces. In other words, the permanent magnet unit according
to the present invention has a region of relatively high coercive force (also referred
to as a high coercive force region), and a region of relatively low coercive force
(also referred to as a low coercive force region). It is preferable that each of
the at least two types of permanent magnets is arranged depending on the degree
of the demagnetization force that each permanent magnet piece will receive during
manufacture of the permanent magnet unit. Here, arranged depending on the degree
of the demagnetization force, means providing the high coercive force region in
the region which receives relatively large demagnetization force during manufacture
of the permanent magnet unit, and providing the low coercive force region in at
least a part of, and preferably the entirety of the region which receives relatively
small demagnetization force. More specifically, it is preferable that the permanent
magnet piece that receives the large demagnetization force has a larger coercive
force than at least one other type of the permanent magnet piece during manufacture
of the permanent magnet unit.
By containing such a high coercive force region and low coercive force
region, an inexpensive magnet having low coercive force can be used to manufacture
the permanent magnet unit without substantial loss of magnetism due to the demagnetization
field, and the cost of the permanent magnet required to manufacture the magnetic
circuit can be reduced. Namely, the permanent magnet unit according to the present
invention can be manufactured without substantial reduction in magnetism caused
by the demagnetization field, because the permanent magnet piece that receives relatively
large demagnetization force has high coercive force. On the other hand, for the
permanent magnet unit according to the present invention, since the permanent magnet
piece that receives relatively low demagnetization force has a low coercive force,
there is no necessity to use a magnet whose coercive force is high and which requires
special materials or technology when manufacturing this permanent magnet piece,
and thus the cost of the permanent magnet needed to manuf acture the magnetic circuit
can be reduced.
Here, when manufacturing the permanent magnet unit, the high coercive
force region and the low coercive force region can be determined at the design stage.
It is already standard practice to use magnetic field analysis during the design,
and at this time it is possible to determine the operating points of the parts of
the magnet unit, namely the magnetic flux density and the demagnetization field
can be determined at that position. The magnet unit can be designed generally so
that there is no reduction in the magnetic field, provided that the operating point
is above the knick point (the point at which the slope of the curve curves downward)
of the BH curve of the magnet. The BH curve is substantially determined by the remanent
flux density and coercive force of the magnet. When magnets with the same remanent
flux density are placed in the same position of the magnet unit, since the magnet
having larger coercive force has a larger magnetic field which shows knick point,
the magnet of larger coercive force can withstand a higher demagnetization field.
The operating point of the parts of the magnet unit depends on the shape of the
magnet unit, and the region that receives and does not receive the high demagnetization
force is substantially continuously distributed.
For example, although it is not a specific limitation, it is preferable
that the region where there is the possibility of a substantial reduction in the
coercive force in case of the permanent magnet piece of the low coercive force region
due to the demagnetization force received during manufacture of the permanent magnet
unit, and which receives larger demagnetization field than the knick point of the
magnet of small coercive force is the high coercive force region; and that the rest
of the region which receives small demagnetization field is the low coercive force
region. This is because, even when the low coercive force region is constituted
by an inexpensive permanent magnet material that does not require special material
or technology, if it does not receive smaller demagnetization field than the knick
point of the magnet having small coercive force, there is no possibility of a substantial
loss of magnetism in the region.
It is preferable that all of the at least two types of permanent magnet
pieces have a coercive force that is large enough such that there is no substantial
reduction in magnetism due to the demagnetization force received by the permanent
magnetic pieces during manufacture of the permanent magnetic unit. It should be
noted that in the specification, no substantial reduction in magnetism, means a
case in which even after receiving an demagnetization force, the permanent magnet
unit has a sufficiently large magnetic flux density so that the magnetic circuit
can demonstrate a sufficiently large magnetic field strength, and that its function
as a magnetic circuit is not lost. More specifically, although it is not a specific
limitation, no substantial reduction in magnetism means a case in which, after receiving
the demagnetization force, when the demagnetization force is eliminated, the permanent
magnet unit preferably still has at least 97% of the original magnetic flux density
before receiving the demagnetization force.
FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing the high coercive force region
and the low coercive force region of the permanent magnet unit according to the
present invention. More specifically, as illustrated in FIG. 2, it is preferable
that the region of the central portion of the permanent magnet unit is the high
coercive force region, and that at least a part, and preferably the entirety of
the other region is the low coercive force region. As described above, this is because
the magnet receives the largest demagnetization field at the stage before the pole
pieces are arranged when assembling the magnetic circuit, and the demagnetization
field received at this time has a distribution, and is particularly large in the
region of the central portion of the permanent magnet unit. Although not particularly
limiting, the high coercive force region is preferably the central portion of the
permanent magnet unit, preferably has at least 60% and less than 100% of the area
of the opposing face of the permanent magnet unit, and more preferably at least
70% and at most 80% of the area of the central portion. This is because the region
in this range receives a particularly large demagnetization force when manufacturing
the permanent magnet unit. Furthermore, as described above, it is preferable to
set the entirety of the region other than the central portion (peripheral portion)
to be the low coercive force region, since this enables the maximum magnet cost
reduction, however it is not necessary that the entirety of the peripheral portion
is a low coercive force region, and it is possible that only a portion of the peripheral
region is a low magnetic force region and the rest of the region is a high coercive
force region. It should be noted that, the central portion of the permanent magnet
unit, for example in the case of the central 60% portion of the permanent magnet
unit, means a region that has 60% of the area of the permanent magnet unit, and
is a similar shape as the permanent magnet unit, and has the same center of gravity
as the permanent magnet unit.
Although it is not a specific limitation, it is preferable that at
room temperature (preferably 25°C), the coercive force of the permanent magnet piece
of the high coercive force region satisfies Formula 1 given below, and even more
preferable that it has a coercive force of at least 850 kA/m. This is because, although
particularly if the magnetic circuit is used in MRI, generally, the principal magnetic
field has a magnetic field strength of at least 0.1 T and the permanent magnet that
forms the principal magnetic field of the magnetic circuit has a remanent flux density
of at least 1.2 T, when this is satisfied, there is no possibility that the magnetic
field of the permanent magnet unit will be substantially reduced by the demagnetization
force. It should be noted that the coercive force (bHc) and the remanent flux density
(Br) are measured in accordance with JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard) C 2501,
and, for example, can be measured by a BH tracer.
Coercive force (kA/m) ≥ 636.6 × Remanent flux density (T) ... (Formula
1)
The coercive force of the permanent magnet piece in the low coercive
force region can have any value less than the coercive force of the permanent magnet
piece in the high coercive force region, without particular limitation. Particularly,
it is preferable that the coercive force of the low coercive force region is a coercive
force of a common magnetic material that can be inexpensively obtained and whose
manufacture does not demand special material or technology. For example, although
it is not a specific limitation, it is possible that the coercive force in the low
coercive force region is at least 700 kA/m and less than the coercive force of the
high coercive force region.
Furthermore, although it is not a specific limitation, it is generally
preferable to select a rare earth permanent magnet such as, for example, a Nd2Fe14B-based
rare earth permanent magnet as the permanent magnet material suitable for the permanent
magnet unit according to the present invention. Particularly, it is preferable that
the permanent magnet material used in the high coercive force region is a Nd2Fe14B-based
rare earth permanent magnet which further contains additional element, such as dysprosium
(Dy), terbium (Tb), praseodymium (Pr), gallium (Ga), molybdenum (Mo) and/or vanadium
(V) in addition with the principal components. These are in order to further increase
the coercive force. On the contrary, it is preferable that the permanent magnet
material used for the low coercive force region is the magnet material described
above that does not include the additional element such as Dy and Tb or those in
which these element is reduced. This is because that by not including, or reducing
these high priced elements it is possible to manufacture the low coercive force
region at low cost. The permanent magnet material can be manufactured by any known
method.
As described above, a magnetic circuit with opposing permanent magnets
according to the present invention, comprises a yoke magnetically coupled to the
permanent magnet units, and provided outside of the permanent magnet units and the
gap. Thus, a closed magnetic circuit is formed. Since the yoke 3 can be the same
as a conventional ones, a detailed description is hereby omitted. There is not particular
limitation to the shape of the yoke and it can be any, for example, it can be letter-C-shaped,
square, or be shaped as two columns. More specifically, a pair of substantially
parallel plate-shaped yokes can be supported by column-shaped yokes, and the permanent
magnets can be provided on opposing faces of the plate-shaped yokes.
As described above, a magnetic circuit with opposing permanent magnets
according to the present invention, comprises a pair of pole pieces each arranged
on a gap side of an opposing surface of each of the permanent magnet units and having
a peripheral projection in opposing direction. This improves the uniformity of the
magnetic field of the magnetic circuit. Namely, if a spherical or elliptical space
(also referred to as an evaluation space) is theoretically provided in the central
portion of the gap, and the uniformity of the magnetic field of the magnetic circuit
is evaluated according to the magnetic field distribution in the evaluation space,
then when the pole pieces are simple disk-shapes, the magnetic field strength at
the equatorial portion of the evaluation space is lower than at the pole portions.
On the other hand, if pole pieces is provided with peripheral projection, then the
physical distance between the equatorial portion of the evaluation space and the
peripheral projection is closer, the magnetic field strength increases at the equatorial
portion, and thus the uniformity of the magnetic field improves across the entire
evaluation space. The pole pieces 4 may be the same as conventional ones and thus
a detailed description is hereby omitted. Furthermore, in order to further improve
the uniformity of the magnetic field, a plurality of small projections whose step
is smaller than that of the peripheral projection can be provided on a periphery
of a base portion of the pole pieces.
In addition, it is preferable that a magnetic circuit with opposing
permanent magnets according to the present invention, further comprises a pair of
inclined magnetic field coils 5 each arranged on a gap side of an opposing surface
of each of the pole pieces and inside the peripheral projection, and opposing each
other across the gap. The uniformity of the magnetic field of the uniform magnetic
field space between the gap of the pole pieces can be intentionally, linearly disrupted
by the inclined magnetic field coil. Provided that NMR signals including the non-uniform
magnetic field are received at this time, spatial information can also be provided
when the signal is converted to an image.
Although it is not a specific limitation, the permanent magnet unit
according to the present invention can be manufactured by methods described in Japanese
Patent Provisional Publication No. 2000-51175 A and Japanese Patent Provisional
Publication No. H8-339916/1996 A. As described in these documents, the permanent
magnet unit can be configured with a plurality of permanent magnet pieces, for example
cubes whose sides are in the order of 25 mm to 100 mm. In this case, the regions
described above can be corresponded to the permanent magnet pieces as follows. Namely,
the above-described regions can be set as regions occupied by permanent magnet pieces
of which at least half the area of the region is occupied by the above-described
regions. More specifically, a specific permanent magnet piece is included in a specific
region may be defined to mean the case in which at least half the area of the permanent
magnet piece is included in the region. The relationship between the permanent magnet
piece and the region is shown in FIG. 3. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the central portion
of the permanent magnet unit can be constituted by the high coercive force permanent
magnet piece (high coercive force region 6) and the other region can be constituted
by the permanent magnet piece of a low coercive force (low coercive force region
7).
EXAMPLES
A working example of the present invention is described below with
reference to the attached drawings. Naturally, the working example that is described
below does not limit the present invention.
In the present working example, the magnetic circuit with opposing
permanent magnets illustrated in FIG. 1 was used, whose magnetic field strength
is 0.2 T, and whose gap between the upper and lower inclined magnetic field coils
is 400 mm. For the upper and lower permanent magnet units, a permanent magnet piece
made from a permanent magnet material of a type shown in Table 1 below was used.
The characteristics of the permanent magnet material (remanent flux density and
coercive force), are obtained by measuring with a sample cut from the magnet block
in accordance with JIS C 2501 by a BH tracer.
Characteristics of magnet material
Type
Remanent flux density (T)
Coercive force (kA/m)
Coercive force / Remanent flux density
High coercive force type
1.32
955
723.5
Normal type
1.32
820
621.2
* High coercive force type: Nd2Fe14B-based rare earth magnet
manufactured by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. This high coercive force type magnet contains
twice as much Dy and Tb as the normal type.
* Normal type: Nd2Fe14B-based rare earth magnet manufactured
by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co.
* The values of coercive force and the remanent flux density shown are as at 25°C.
As the Working Example 1, a magnet circuit constituted by a high coercive
force type magnet in 70% of the central portion of the permanent magnet units and
a normal type in the rest of the region was used. In addition, a magnetic circuit
in which the entire region of the permanent magnet units is constituted by a high
coercive force type magnet was used as Comparative Example 1, and a magnet in which
the entire region of the permanent magnet unit is constituted by a normal type magnet
was used as Comparative Example 2. Table 2 shows the magnetic field strength (T)
and the cost of the magnets necessary to constitute magnetic circuits of Working
Example 1 and of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, wherein the cost of Comparative Example
1 is given as 100. The magnetic field strength of the magnetic circuit were measured
at a position at the center of the gap using a METROLAB NMR Tesla Meter PT2025.
Magnetic field strength of the magnetic circuits
Configuration
Magnetic field strength (T)
Magnet cost
Comparative Example 1
High coercive force type only
0.2030
100
Working Example 1
High coercive force type in 70% of center portion, normal type
elsewhere
0.2035
96
Comparative Example 2
Normal type only
0.1852
90
As shown in Table 2, according to the present invention, by configuring
only the central portion of the permanent magnet unit with a magnet whose coercive
force is high, and the rest of the region with a magnet whose coercive force is
low, the cost of the magnet can be reduced by 4%, compared to that of the permanent
magnet unit whose entire region is constituted by a magnet whose coercive force
is high, and it is possible to generate a magnetic field strength of the same level
as that of the permanent magnet unit whose entire region is constituted by magnet
whose coercive force is high. On the other hand, when the entire region of the permanent
magnet unit was constituted by a magnet whose coercive force is low, there was a
reduction in magnetism during assembling the permanent magnet unit, and the design
value of the magnetic field of at least 0.2 T could not be obtained.
It should be understood that the foregoing disclosure emphasizes certain
specific embodiments of the invention and that all modifications or alternatives
equivalent thereto are within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth
in the appended claims.