The present invention relates to novel animal feeds containing
lanthanide compounds, as well as to the use of lanthanide compounds for reducing
the digestibility of phosphorus contained in animal feeds.
Dietary phosphate restriction is a recommended strategy
for preventing premature deterioration of renal function or for slowing down the
progression of existing chronic renal insufficiency in mammalian species, particularly
carnivores such as cats and dogs. A number of special pet diet brands with reduced
phosphate contents are available on the market. However, phosphate restriction in
feeds for example for carnivores is technically problematical due to the fact that
meat proteins naturally contain abundant amounts of phosphate organically bound
in glycerol phosphatides such as lecithins and phosphatidyl colamines, phosphatidyl
serines, or phosphatidyl inositols, and also in mono- and poly-nucleotides including
the DNA and (m)RNA, in inositol phosphates, and in other endogenous molecules. This
vast over-supply of phosphates can be partly reduced by replacing meat by milk protein,
although only at the expense of palatability and consequently feed acceptance by
the target species.
Basically, the use of intestinal phosphate binders could
serve to further reduce phosphorus digestibility beyond the limits of dietary protein/phosphate
restriction. However, the use of classical phosphate binders such as calcium or
aluminium compounds, has proven disappointing in terms of the risk/benefit ratio
or palatability. While they may help to control the finely tuned circulating serum
phosphate levels in the case of patients suffering from late stage chronic renal
failure, their use for the management of mild to moderate chronic renal insufficiency
prior to the occurrence of hyperphosphatemia is not common practice. In addition,
many expert veterinarian nephrologists question their benefit unless they are given
to animals in conjunction with feeds already restricted in protein/phosphate.
There is therefore a need for non-toxic agents which can
be used as a feed additive for decreasing phosphate digestibility in basically any
animal feed while maintaining the palatability of the feed concerned.
The potent phosphate-binding capacity of rare earth metal
ions has recently attracted the awareness of human nephrologists, especially because
they are not absorbed in relevant quantities after oral ingestion by mammals and
hence show very low oral toxicity according to the Hodge-Sterner classification
system (Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Quart. 10:93, 1943). Their potential use for immobilizing
phosphate ions in body fluids such as blood has been disclosed in Japanese Published
Patent Application (Kokai) No. 62-145024. Lanthanum salts, in particular lanthanum
carbonates and oxycarbonates, have been further proposed as pharmaceutical treatments
of hyperphosphatemia in patients with advanced chronic renal failure (WO 96/30029,
WO 2004/016553), because hemodialysis fails to sufficiently remove phosphate ions
from the blood, so that the levels constantly rise. In addition, the therapeutic
use of rare earth metal compounds, including lanthanum salts, has been recently
claimed to be useful for the prevention of kidney stones - due to their absorption
of oxalate (WO 02/085348) - or for treating or preventing hypercalcemia (WO 03/094933)
and for treating bone diseases (WO 02/002277).
Although the control of pre-existing hyperphosphatemia
in human patients with end-stage renal disease by the therapeutic administration
of pharmaceutical compositions of lanthanum compounds is now state of the art, the
dietary use of such compounds in nutritional strategies for protecting animals from
the threat of excess phosphate bioavailability has not so far been addressed. Both
strategies rely on the phosphate binding properties of the compounds in vitro, although
they do differ in quite important respects: While the pharmaceutical treatment aims
to reverse a pathological state such as hyperphosphatemia, the basic goal of the
nutritional approach is to support the physiological function of the kidneys of
subjects in good health. Indeed, the therapeutic modification of the finely tuned
hemostasis of phosphate may already be achieved with minor changes in phosphate
absorption from the gastrointestinal tract in vivo, which do not lead to detectable
changes in phosphate digestibility and hence are not of long-term nutritional benefit.
It has been seriously questioned that conventional phosphate binders (in particular
calcium and aluminium compounds) can bring about an important reduction in the phosphorus
digestibility of feeds due to the abundance of dietary phosphates which largely
exceed the physiological requirements of the consumer's organism.
We have now discovered that certain forms of lanthanide
compounds are surprisingly capable of safely producing a potent and physiologically
significant reduction in the digestibility of phosphorus of animal feeds, even when
added to commercial feeds containing abundant amounts of phosphorus, while at the
same time having no negative impact on the palatability of these diets.
Hence, this invention relates to the use of a lanthanide
compound as a feed additive in animal nutrition for reducing the digestibility of
phosphorus in animal feeds.
According to a further aspect, the present invention relates
to animal feeds containing a lanthanide compound.
The lanthanides - also referred to as rare earth metals
- are: lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), praseodymium (Pr), neodymium (Nd), promethium
(Pm), samarium (Sm), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), terbium (Tb), dysprosium (Dy),
holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb) and lutetium (Lu). The preferred
lanthanide according to this invention is lanthanum.
The lanthanide compounds of this invention are usually
salts in which the lanthanide cations are typically trivalent. Those that may also
occur in other oxidation states are well-known in the art [e.g. Ce(IV)]. In the
context of the present invention compounds containing trivalent lanthanide cations
are preferred.
Examples of salts that may be used according to the present
invention are: carbonates, oxycarbonates, halides, preferably chlorides, oxyhalides,
preferably oxychlorides, and salts of organic acids, preferably formates and acetates.
It is well known that lanthanide salts often form hydrates
and/or oxy-salts (such as the examples given above). Suitable hydrates and/or oxysalts
may also be used according to the invention.
Generally, the present invention may be used for all animals
where a reduction in phosphorus digestibility is desirable. For the reasons mentioned
above, the present invention is particularly useful for animals whose diet comprises
elevated amounts of phosphorus (usually from meat), such as, in particular, carnivores.
Preferred examples of carnivores are dogs and especially cats.
In the context of the present invention, the term 'phosphorus'
refers to dietary phosphorus which occurs naturally and is absorbed from the gastrointestinal
tract mainly in the form of organically bound or inorganic phosphate. In blood,
bones, urine and faeces, phosphates are the predominant forms in which phosphorus
occurs. Phosphates cannot however be quantified in feeds and faeces, which are therefore
usually ashed and the resulting inorganic phosphorus oxides are quantified in the
dry matter by state of the art techniques. The difference between the calculated
amount of ingested phosphorus and the amount excreted with the faeces is considered
to be the amount absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Phosphorus digestibility
is therefore calculated by the equation
A reduction in dietary phosphorus digestibility is beneficial
for mammalian organisms and in particular for species consuming meat such as carnivores,
because their feeds generally contain more phosphates than they need actually need
for maintaining their physiological functions. The amount of phosphate absorbed
in excess of the physiologically required amounts must be excreted mainly via the
kidneys. Otherwise, soft tissue mineralization, disturbances in calcium metabolism,
secondary hyperparathyroidism and many other sequels of hyperphosphatemia impair
the health of the organism in the long term. The phosphate-eliminating organs, i.e.
the kidneys, are at particular risk of damage by an over-supply of phosphates, thus
leading to further impairments of phosphate elimination and finally resulting in
an ultimately lethal vicious circle.
As long as the renal function is normal and sufficient
to remove all excess phosphates from the blood, the blood levels of phosphate are
kept within narrow limits. Any reduction in phosphorus (phosphate) digestibility
is welcome in order to avoid an unnecessary burden on the kidneys and thereby protect
their functionality for good health and long life.
Usually, a physiologically significant reduction in the
systemic phosphate supply can be achieved if 10-80% of the digestible phosphorus
in a diet is reduced. The amounts of lanthanides to be added to the feeds in order
to achieve this goal are of course dependent on the quantity of digestible phosphates
contained therein. As a general rule, an amount of lanthanide compound corresponding
to 0.1 - 100 g of an elemental lanthanide (preferably 0.5 - 50 g) should be added
per kg of dry feed mass, the lower range being preferably used for diets already
restricted in phosphorus by state of the art techniques and the higher range for
diets rich in phosphorus.
Unexpectedly, it has been found that even the addition
of high amounts of lanthanide compounds to animal feeds does not significantly reduce
the palatability of the animal feed. This is particularly surprising since cats
are very sensitive to changes in their food, whether in smell, taste, mouthfeel
or otherwise.
The lanthanide compound may be added to the animal feed
during production and thus becomes an integral part of the animal feed. However,
it is also possible for the lanthanide compound itself or a suitable composition
containing same to be added to the animal feed by the animal's carer e.g. before
presenting the feed to the animal.
Although a stoichiometric relationship between the phosphates
contained in the feed and the lanthanide compound aimed at reducing the digestibility
of these phosphates is clearly preferred, it is also possible to use the lanthanide
compound or suitable formulations thereof for the preparation of dietary supplements
which are administered to the animals separately from, but in close conjunction
with feeding, such as for example immediately after feeding. The total dose of lanthanide
compound to be administered in dietary supplements should provide a ratio of lanthanide
to dry feed in the range outlined above.
The lanthanide compound may be used per se as a feed additive
without adding any additional ingredients (such as excipients etc.), e.g. for the
commercial production of feedstuffs, in which case the compound is preferably added
in the form of a powder. The preparation of pre-mixes containing the lanthanide
compound as well as further ingredients (e.g. formulation aids) is also possible
and is usually a great help for achieving homogenous distribution in the feed.
The feed additive may also be formulated as a composition
containing further formulation aids. Such feed additive compositions may take the
form of a powder or a granular product. The term feed additive according to the
present invention also comprises dietary supplements which are given to the animal
separately from the meals but with the same goal of reducing the digestibility of
phosphorus contained in the animal's feed. Such dietary supplements are typically
solid formulations e.g. in the form of tablets, chewables etc. Fluid products can
also be used, such as suspensions, which - depending on their viscosity - may be
in the form of liquids, gels or pastes. Solutions of lanthanide salts can for example
be used in the industrial preparation of feeds, e.g. during the preparation of pre-mixes
or dietary supplements. The use of liquids containing dissolved lanthanides as feed
additives to be added to ready-to-use feeds, for instance by the owner of a cat
or dog, is, however, not recommended due to the fact that dissolved compounds usually
can be more effectively absorbed via the stomach compared with suspended or solid
formulations of less soluble lanthanide salts.
It is believed that based on the above description, one
skilled in the art can utilize the present invention to its fullest extent without
any further elaboration being necessary. The following examples are, therefore,
to be considered as merely illustrative and by no means limitative.
Examples:
A. Example of the preparation of a complete food for pets:
A complete food is prepared according to state of the art
techniques using appropriate amounts of ingredients to cover at least all of the
basic nutritive requirements of the target animal species. A pre-mix of the lanthanide
compound is advantageously prepared, for example using corn starch as a carrier
in order to facilitate the homogenous distribution in the feed. The resulting complete
food, containing for instance 1 or 5 g lanthanum carbonate octahydrate per kg complete
food (dry mass), may be further processed in order to achieve commercial or experimental
complete foods in suitable presentations.
B. Examples of the formulation of dietary supplements:
Formulation example 1:
An amount of 0.1 g of sorbic acid is dissolved in 10 g
of propylene glycol and 0.5 g of xanthane are dispersed in the mixture. In a second
container, 10 g of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate are dispersed in 50 g of water.
The xanthane suspension is added with vigorous stirring to the suspension of lanthanum
carbonate. Water is added to obtain a final volume of 100 ml. The resulting suspension
is filled into suitable applicators to provide dosing of the dietary supplement
with sufficient accuracy.
Formulation example 2:
A mixture of 0.1 g of methyl parabene and 2.0 g of microcrystalline
cellulose/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Avicel CL 611) is dispersed in 10 g of
glycerol to form a pre-mix. In a second container, 50 g of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate
are dispersed in 50 g of water. A mixture of 0.5 g of &agr;-tocopherol acetate
and 1.0 g of polysorbate 80 is added to this suspension. Then the pre-mix described
above is also added with vigorous stirring. The suspension is homogenised using
a suitable technical device (e.g. a rotor-stator) and water is added to obtain a
final volume of 100 ml. The final suspension can be portioned in 1.0 ml aliquots
and packed into suitable disposable containers, e.g. sachets.
Formulation example 3:
3.0 g of glyceryl citrate lactate linoleate oleate (Imwitor
375) are dissolved in 6.5 g of fish oil while heating to 80°C. This solution
is added with intense stirring to 40 g of water heated to 80°C and the mixture
is cooled to ambient temperature. Then, 50 g of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate
are suspended in this emulsion. Water is added to obtain a final volume of 100 ml.
The resulting suspension is filled into suitable applicators, to provide dosing
of the dietary supplement with sufficient accuracy.
Formulation example 4:
A pre-weighed amount of 50 g of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate
is thoroughly mixed with 48 g of corn starch and 2 g of highly dispersed silica
(e.g. Aerosil 200). The resulting homogeneous powder mixture can be portioned in
1.0 ml aliquots and packed into suitable disposable containers, e.g. sachets, or
alternatively filled into a bigger container equipped with a suitable dosing aid.
Formulation example 5:
500 g of Lanthanum carbonate octahydrate 300 g of corn
starch, and 185 g of microcrystalline cellulose are thoroughly mixed and granulated
with 100 ml of a 5% (m/v) aqueous solution of methyl hydroxypropyl cellulose 3cSt
(Pharmacoat 603). After sieving, the moist granulate is dried at 50°C by a
state of the art method and admixed with 10 g of colloidal anhydrous silica (Aerosil
200). The final formulation is packed into suitable containers for applying multiple
or single doses of 3.0 g.
C. Biological examples
Biological example 1:
Within the context of a larger study, 24 adult healthy
domestic cats of both genders, individually fed with a commercially available regular
canned diet ('Petley's Gourmet Supreme Beef Casserole', PROMEAL (PTY) Ltd., containing
0,19% phosphorus corresponding to 1,13% phosphorus in the dry matter), were randomised
to three equal groups of eight animals which were fed for two weeks with dose levels
corresponding to 0, 0.3, and 3.0 grams of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate per kg
of feed in their daily feed ration.
During the study the amount of food consumed was recorded
daily and the animals were observed daily for the possible occurrence of adverse
events. In the faeces collected over a three-day sampling period at the end of the
study, the phosphorus levels were measured. On comparing the dietary intake of phosphorus
with the excretion of phosphorus in the faeces, the apparent phosphorus digestibility
was calculated according to the following equation:
The addition of lanthanum carbonate dose-dependently increased
the phosphorus content in the faeces (Figure 1.1), thus indicating that less phosphorus
was absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract in cats fed on a diet enriched with
lanthanum carbonate. The apparent phosphorus digestibility which takes into account
the amount of phosphorus ingested with the feed showed a corresponding decrease
as a result of the addition of the lanthanum compound (Figure 1.2). This result
is quite remarkable in view of the fact that the diet used in this study was quite
rich in phosphorus.
The addition of the lanthanide compound to the diet had
no negative effect on feed acceptance and tolerance in the study animals.
Biological example 2:
A total of twelve adult healthy female beagle dogs were
individually fed with a commercially available regular canned feed ('Eukanuba Adult
with much lamb', IAMs Pet Food Ltd., containing 0,25% of phosphorus corresponding
to 1,09% phosphorus in the dry matter). At weekly intervals, their diet was supplemented
with increasing amounts of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate, thus resulting in final
concentrations of the feed additive of 0, 1.75, 5.0, and 17.5 g of lanthanum carbonate
octahydrate per kg of feed.
During the study the amount of food consumed was recorded
daily and the animals were observed daily for the possible occurrence of adverse
events. In the faeces collected over a two-day sampling period at the end of the
study, the phosphorus levels were measured. On comparing the dietary intake of phosphorus
with the excretion of phosphorus in the faeces, the apparent phosphorus digestibility
was calculated according to the following equation:
The addition of lanthanum carbonate dose-dependently increased
the phosphorus content in the faeces (Figure 2.1), thus indicating that less phosphorus
was absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract in dogs fed on a diet enriched with
lanthanum carbonate. The apparent phosphorus digestibility which takes into account
the amount of phosphorus ingested with the feed showed a corresponding decrease
as a result of the addition of the lanthanum compound (Figure 2.2). This result
is quite remarkable in view of the fact that the feed used in this study was quite
rich in phosphorus.
The addition of the lanthanide compound to the diet had
no negative effect on feed acceptance and tolerance in the study animals.
Biological example 3:
Fifteen adult healthy domestic cats of both genders were
individually fed with commercially available regular canned diet (Premium Paté
rich in lamb, IAMS Pet Food GmbH & Co containing 0.26 % of phosphorus corresponding
to 1.13% phosphorus in the dry matter). The aim of the study was to assess the palatability
and safety of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate especially in high doses. Therefore
10 cats were fed lanthanum carbonate octahydrate in their daily feed ration at increasing
doses. The study began with a dose level of about 12-15 g per kg of feed (dry matter).
The dose was doubled every two weeks up to a dose level of about 96-120 g per kg
of feed (dry matter). Five cats were given the feed without any lanthanum carbonate
octahydrate and served as controls.
Palatability was assessed daily by observing the general
acceptance of the feed. Tolerability and safety were assessed by measuring the blood
serum phosphate levels and body weight at regular intervals as well as by daily
observations concerning the health status and the possible occurrence of adverse
events.
Up to a dose level of 1g/kg of body weight (= about 108
mg per kg of dry feed), there were no changes in the serum phosphate levels, no
changes in body weight and no limiting adverse events. The acceptance of the diet
was 100%, even at 4g of lanthanum carbonate octahydrate per 150 g of the feed, which
is quite obviously a large amount of powder. Compared to the control cats no difference
in the palatability or acceptance of the feed or its safety could be observed.
The addition of the lanthanide compound to the feed even
in extremely high doses had no negative effect on feed acceptance and the tolerance
of the study animals.