TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention is in the field of molecular biology and,
more specifically, in the field of reporter systems useful for the analysis of protein-protein
interactions.
BACKGROUND
The &bgr;-galactosidase enzyme (&bgr;-gal), the protein
product of the E. coli lacZ gene, is widely used in studies of gene expression
and cell lineage in higher organisms. Several biochemical assays of &bgr;-gal
activity, including live-cell flow cytometry and histochemical staining with the
chromogenic substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl &bgr;-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal)
make the product of the lacZ gene extremely versatile as a quantitative reporter
enzyme, selectable marker, or histological indicator.
Bronstein et al. (1989) J. Biolumin. Chemilumin. 4:99-111
;
Nolan et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 85:2603-2607
; and
Lojda (1979) Enzyme Histochemistry: A Laboratory Manual, Springer, Berl
in. One property of the lacZ system that has been well-characterized
in studies of bacterial genetics, but has not been exploited in eukaryotes is the
phenomenon of intracistronic complementation. Studies in E. coli have shown
that deletions of &bgr;-gal which remove portions of either the N-terminus or
the C-terminus produce enzyme which is inactive. However, coexpression of one of
these deletion mutants with a second inactive deletion mutant containing domains
that are lacking in the first can restore &bgr;-gal enzymatic activity in a process
called complementation. This complemented &bgr;-gal activity arises by concentration-dependent
assembly of a stable hetero-octameric enzyme complex comprising all the essential
domains of the wild-type homotetramer.
Ullman et al. (1965) J. Mol. Biol. 12:918-923
;
Ullman et al. (1967) J. Mol. Biol. 24:339-343
; and
Ullman et al. (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 32:1-13
.
Mohler and Blau, PNAS, 1996 93: 12423-12427
describe co-expression of two distinct mutant lacZ peptides in a mammalian
cell, and detection of &bgr;-galactosidase activity using a novel fluorescent
substrate.
A system utilizing &bgr;-gal complementation in enzyme
assays has been described. Henderson,
U.S. Patent 4,708,929
. In this system, enzymatically inactive &bgr;-gal polypeptide fragments,
capable of combining with high affinity to form active &bgr;-gal by complementation,
are used. One of the fragments is conjugated to analyte, which allows it to compete
with analyte for binding to an analyte-binding protein. If bound to the analyte-binding
protein, the &bgr;-gal fragment is unable to complement. Thus, by comparing &bgr;-gal
activity in the presence of sample to that obtained in the presence of a known concentration
of analyte (at equal concentrations of analyte-binding protein) the amount of analyte
in the sample may be determined. This method requires high-affinity complementing
subunits of &bgr;-gal, requires that an analyte-binding protein be known, and
is not applicable to single-cell analysis.
Another &bgr;-gal complementation system for the detection
of analytes in samples is disclosed by
EP-A1-0461828
, but this system is also not applicable to single-cell analyses.
Previous systems for the study of protein-protein interactions
have been described which utilize two fusion genes whose products reconstitute the
function of a transcriptional activator.
Fields et al., (1989) Nature 340:245-247
;
Bai et al., (1996) Meth. Enzymol. 273:331-347
;
Luo et al., (1997) BioTechniques 22(2):350-352
. In one fusion gene, a sequence encoding a first protein is conjugated
to a sequence encoding a DNA-binding domain of a transcriptional regulatory protein.
In a second fusion gene, a sequence encoding a second protein is conjugated to a
sequence encoding a transcriptional activation domain of a transcriptional regulatory
protein. The two fusion genes are co-transfected into a cell which also contains
a reporter gene whose expression is controlled by a DNA regulatory sequence that
is bound by the DNA-binding domain encoded by the first fusion gene. Expression
of the reporter gene requires that a transcriptional activation domain be brought
adjacent to the DNA regulatory sequence. Binding of the first protein to the second
protein will bring the transcriptional activation domain encoded by the second fusion
gene into proximity with the DNA-binding domain encoded by the first fusion gene,
thereby stimulating transcription of the reporter gene. Thus, the level of expression
of the reporter gene will reflect the degree of binding between the first and second
proteins:
There are several disadvantages associated with the use
of the above-mentioned system. As it is dependent upon transcriptionally-regulated
expression of a reporter gene, this system is limited to the assay of interactions
that take place in the nucleus. In addition, the assay is indirect, relying on transcriptional
activation of a reporter gene whose product is diffusible. Hence, a method which
would allow a direct and immediate examination of molecular interactions, at the
site where they occur, would be desirable.
A system for detecting protein-protein interactions, not
limited to nuclear interactions, has been described.
U.S. Patent Nos. 5,503,977
and
5,585,245
. In this system, fusions between potential interacting polypeptides and
mutant subunits of the protein ubiquitin are formed. Juxtaposition of the two ubiquitin
subunits brought about by interaction between potential interacting polypeptides
creates a substrate for a ubiquitin-specific protease, and a small peptide reporter
fragment is released. In this system, binding between the potential interacting
polypeptides does not generate any type of enzymatic activity; therefore, signal
amplification is not possible. Additionally, the ubiquitin system does not measure
activity in intact cells, but relies on assays of proteolysis in cell-free extracts.
What is needed is a sensitive method for examining protein interactions in intact
cells in the relevant cellular compartment.
Fluorescence imaging has been used to study the intracellular
biochemistry of living cells. A fluorescent indicator for the adenosine 3',5'-cyclic
monophosphate (cAMP) signaling pathway has been described in which the sensor is
a cAMP kinase in which the catalytic and regulatory subunits each are labeled with
a different fluorescent dye, such as fluorescein or rhodamine, capable of fluorescence
resonance energy transfer in the holoenzyme complex. A change in shape of the fluorescence
emission spectrum occurs upon cAMP binding, and therefore activation of the kinase
can be visualized in cells microinjected with the labeled holoenzyme.
Adams et al., Nature, 349: 694-697 (1991
). This system is limited by the fact that it requires microinjection,
and a preferred distance between the labeled units for energy transfer to occur.
Substrates for &bgr;-lactamase have been described in
the art which include a fluorescent donor moiety and a quencher, which include an
attached group which makes them permeable through cell membranes, wherein the attached
group is hydrolyzed off after the substrate enters the cell. Fluorescence energy
transfer between the donor and quencher is monitored as an indicator of &bgr;-lactamase
activity. This system also can be used in a reporter gene assay using cells containing
&bgr;-lactamase reporter genes functionally linked to a promoter.
PCT WO 96/30540 published October 3, 1996
.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides methods and compositions
for detecting, assaying and quantitating molecular interactions within living cells
and in vitro, through complementation between two or more low affinity reporter
subunits, such as distinct E. coli lacZ mutations. In a preferred embodiment,
protein-protein interactions within living cells are detected and quantitated using
the methods and compositions of the present invention. The practice of the present
invention enables, for the first time, the study of protein-protein interactions
and their control in living mammalian cells without reliance upon the transcriptional
activation of a reporter gene construct. Association of the proteins of interest
results directly in enzyme activity and is independent of other cellular functions.
Therefore, the present invention provides advantages over other systems currently
in use by allowing the detection of complexes that are excluded from the nucleus,
and detection of complexes whose formation would inhibit transcription. Furthermore,
the present invention allows the detection and localization of specific binding
interactions within cells at different stages of development and differentiation,
and an analysis of the induction or inhibition of binding interactions in cells.
Interactions occurring within the nucleus of the cell,
interactions occurring in the cytoplasm, on the cell surface, within or on the surface
of organelles, or between cytoplasmic and surface (either cellular or organellar)
molecules, as well a interactions occurring outside the cell, are all capable of
being detected in the practice of the present invention. Thus, the invention surmounts
the limitations associated with previous assays for protein-protein interactions,
which were either limited to interactions occurring in the nucleus, or did not always
allow accurate localization of molecular interactions, and which were not well-suited
for detection of interactions which resulted in inhibition of transcription or translation.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, the invention provides
a reporter system comprising:
- a first component comprising a first low-affinity reporter subunit, coupled
to a first putative binding moiety; and at least a second component comprising a
second low-affinity reporter subunit coupled to a second putative binding partner
of the first putative binding moiety;
wherein the first low-affinity reporter subunit associates with at least a second
low-affinity reporter subunit to generate an enzymatically active complex that generates
a product that directly generates a detectable signal in a living mammalian cell,
said association being mediated by binding of the first putative binding moiety
to the second putative binding moiety;
wherein the binding affinity of the putative binding moieties for each other is
greater than the binding affinity of the first and second reporter subunits for
each other, wherein the first and second reporter subunits are low-affinity binding
subunits of &bgr;-galactosidase.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method
of determining the occurrence of binding between first and second putative binding
moieties, the method comprising:
- a) combining the first component and the second component of a reporter system
of the invention; and
- b) detecting the presence or absence of the signal.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a method
of screening for binding of a first binding moiety with members of a plurality of
different second putative binding moieties, the method comprising:
- (a) providing a plurality of reporter systems of the invention each comprising:
- a first component comprising a first low affinity reporter subunit coupled to
the first binding moiety; and
- one of a plurality of second components each comprising a second low affinity
reporter subunit coupled to one of said plurality of second putative binding moieties,
wherein in each of said second components, said second putative binding moiety is
different;
- (b) individually combining the first component with each of the plurality of
second components to produce a plurality of binding assay samples, each of which
includes the first component and a different one of the second components; and
- (c) detecting the presence or absence of the signal in each of the binding assay
samples.
In another aspect the present invention provides a reporter
system comprising a first tripartite fusion construct comprising (i) a first low
affinity reporter subunit, (ii) a binding protein comprising FK506-binding protein-12
(FKBP12) and (iii) a first putative binding moiety and a second tripartite fusion
construct comprising (i) a second low affinity reporter subunit, (ii) a binding
protein comprising FKBP-rapamycin associated protein (FRAP) and (iii) a second putative
binding moiety, wherein said first and second putative binding moieties are proteins;
wherein the first low affinity reporter subunit is capable of association with at
least the second low affinity reporter subunit to generate an enzymatically active
complex that is capable of generating a product that directly generates a detectable
signal in a living mammalian cell, said association being mediated by binding of
the first putative binding moiety to the second putative binding moiety;
wherein the binding affinity of the putative binding moieties for each other is
greater than the binding affinity of the first and second reporter subunits for
each other.
The invention additionally provides nucleic acids encoding
fusion proteins including a low affinity reporter subunit and a putative binding
moiety, and the fusion proteins encoded by said nucleic acids. The invention further
provides viral vectors comprising nucleic acids encoding such fusions proteins.
The invention also provides cells transformed by the nucleic acids and viral vectors
described above.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
-
Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of three deletion mutant lacZ
constructs, designated &Dgr;&agr;, &Dgr;&ohgr; and &Dgr;µ.
-
Figure 2A is a schematic illustration of a viral construct encoding fusion
proteins of the &Dgr;&agr; or &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal mutants with either
the intracellular FKBP-rapamycin associated protein (FRAP) or the intracellular
rapamycin binding protein, FK506-binding protein-12 (FKBP 12) upstream of the hygromycin
or neomycin resistance genes.
-
Figure 2B is a schematic illustration of a viral construct encoding fusion
proteins of the &Dgr;&agr; or &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal mutants with either
FRAP or FKBP12 and another protein, represented as x and x', upstream of the hygromycin
or neomycin resistance genes.
-
Figure 3A and 3B show X-gal staining of fixed cells expressing both FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;
and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;. Cells shown in 3b were exposed to 10 ng/ml rapamycin for
12 hr. Cells shown in 3a were not exposed to rapamycin.
-
Figure 4A is a graph of &bgr;-gal activity vs. time with and without rapamycin
treatment of C2C12 cells expressing both FKBP12 &Dgr;&ohgr; and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;
fusion proteins.
-
Figure 4B is a graph of the dose-response to rapamycin of the activity of
&bgr;-gal in C2C12 cells expressing both FKBP12 &Dgr;&ohgr; and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;.fusion
proteins.
-
Figure 5 shows rapamycin-dependent increase in &bgr;-gal activity in lysates
from cells expressing both FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; fusion
proteins, measured by chemiluminescence.
-
Figure 6A shows analysis by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of
C2C12 cells expressing both FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; after
90 minutes of rapamycin treatment. Dark peaks represent profiles obtained from untreated
samples; light peaks represent profiles from samples that have been treated with
10 ng/ml rapamycin.
-
Figure 6B shows a FACS profile of untreated cells and indicates a subpopulation
selected on the basis of low &bgr;-gal activity.
-
Figure 6C shows FACS analysis of the subpopulation of cells selected in Figure
6B after overnight culture in the absence (dark peak) or presence (light peak) of
rapamycin. In Figures 6A, 6B and 6C, the vertical axis represents cell number and
the horizontal axis represents intensity of &bgr;-gal fluorescence expressed on
a logarithmic scale.
-
Figure 7 shows EGF receptor dimerization monitored using &bgr;-gal complementation.
-
Figure 7A depicts schematically the rationale of the assay: two weakly complementing
deletion mutants of &bgr;-gal are linked to the extracellular and transmembrane
domains of the EGF receptor. Receptor dimerization, stabilized by EGF, will drive
&bgr;-gal complementation.
-
Figure 7B shows the design of the retroviral constructs used in the assay.
E. coli lacZ deletion mutants &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr; were cloned
into pWZL vectors expressing neomycin or hygromycin resistance, respectively. The
extracellular and transmembrane (tm) domains of human EGF receptor were cloned in
frame with the &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr; mutants.
-
Figure 7C shows FACS analysis of a population of transduced and selected
cells. EGF treatment increases the &bgr;-gal activity (fluorescein fluorescence)
in a substantial proportion of the cells. The FACS profile of cells without EGF
treatment is shaded in light gray and is outlined in white. The profile of cells
treated with EGF is shaded dark gray.
-
Figure 7D shows FACS analysis of chimeric receptor expression, using a monoclonal
antibody to the extracellular domain of the human EGF receptor. The FACS profile
of the transduced and selected population is shaded medium gray and outlined in
white; untransduced cells are shaded light gray and outlined in white. The FACS
was used to clone cells that had low &bgr;-gal activity in the absence of EGF
and showed increased &bgr;-gal activity in the presence of EGF. One clone that
had low levels of the chimeric receptor relative to the population (shaded in dark
gray) was used for further analyses.
-
Figure 7E shows induction of EGF receptor dimerization (&bgr;-gal activity)
in all of the cells of the clone selected in Figure 7D, upon treatment with 100
ng/ml EGF for two hours. Untreated cells are shaded in light gray and outlined in
white; EGF treated cells are shaded in dark gray.
-
Figure 7F shows that dimerization can be detected after very short treatments
with EGF. Cells were treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 0,1,4, 8, and 15 minutes before
cells were rinsed and processed for FACS analysis. The mean fluorescence of the
cell sample is plotted.
-
Figure 8 shows a time-course of EGF receptor dimerization and receptor expression
on the cell surface, following treatment with EGF. Cells expressing chimeric receptors
were treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 0 to 24 hours. Dimerization, as measured by
&bgr;-gal activity, was monitored by FACS, and the mean &bgr;-gal activity (fluorescein
fluorescence) of the cells was plotted (left-hand axis; -■-). Chimeric receptor
levels on the cell surface were measured on the FACS using a monoclonal antibody
to the extracellular domain of the human EGF receptor and a phycoerythrin-labeled
second antibody. Mean phycoerythrin fluorescence values are shown on the right-hand
axis (--▲--). Triplicate samples were analyzed for each time point, and 5000
cells were analyzed for each sample. The error bars indicate the standard deviation
of the replicate samples.
-
Figure 9 shows that EGF receptor dimerization is enhanced by tyrphostin AG1478.
-
Figure 9A shows, in the left panel, schematic diagrams of different regimens
for treatment of cells with EGF, tyrphostin, or both. After the various treatments,
cells were analyzed on the FACS, and the mean fluorescence is shown in the right
panel. Each treatment was performed in triplicate.
-
Figure 9B shows measurements of &bgr;-galactosidase activity in EGF-treated
cells compared with EGF+tyrphostin-treated cells. Cells expressing the chimeric
receptor were treated with either 100 ng/ml EGF (-■-) or EGF and 100 nM tyrphostin
AG1478 for 0 to 24 hours (--▲--). Triplicate samples were analyzed for each
time point, and the error bars indicate the standard deviation of the replicate
samples.
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Definitions
As used herein, the following terms have the following
definitions:
As used herein, a "reporter subunit" refers to a member
of a complex of two or more subunits which are capable of associating with low binding
affinity with each other to generate a detectable signal, or which are capable of
associating with each other and one or more additional substances to generate a
detectable signal, and which do not individually generate the detectable signal.
As used herein, "low affinity" reporter subunits refer
to molecular species which have a sufficiently low binding affinity for each other
such that when they each are covalently attached to two different binding moieties,
they substantially do not become associated unless a binding interaction between
the two binding moieties occurs. "Low affinity" thus generally refers to a binding
affinity which is at least less than that of the attached binding moieties.
As used herein, "binding moieties" refers to at least two
molecular species, such as proteins or fragments thereof, which interact with each
other to form a stable complex.
As used herein, a "detectable signal" refers to any detectable
signal which occurs upon the association of the reporter subunits or via the interaction
of the associated subunits with another substance. The detectable signal may be
for example, a chromogenic, fluorescent, phosphorescent or chemiluminescent signal,
such as a detectable product of an enzymatic reaction catalyzed by the associated
reporter subunits.
The terms "protein", "polypeptide", and "peptide" are used
interchangeably herein to refer to polymers of amino acids of any length. The polymer
may be linear or branched, it may comprise modified amino acids, and it may be interrupted
by non-amino acids. It also may be modified naturally or by intervention; for example,
disulfide bond formation, glycosylation, myristylation, acetylation, alkylation,
phosphorylation or dephosphorylation. Also included within the definition are polypeptides
containing one or more analogs of an amino acid (including, for example, unnatural
amino acids) as well as other modifications known in the art.
Unless otherwise indicated, the practice of the present
invention will employ conventional techniques of molecular biology, biochemistry,
microbiology, recombinant DNA, nucleic acid hybridization, genetics, immunology,
embryology and oncology which are within the skill of the art. Such techniques are
explained fully in the literature. See, for example,
Maniatis, Fritsch & Sambrook, MOLECULAR CLONING: A LABORATORY MANUAL, Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1982
);
Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis, MOLECULAR CLONING: A LABORATORY MANUAL, Second
Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1989
);
Ausubel, et al., CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, John Wiley & Sons
(1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996
).
Reporter Subunits
As used herein, a "reporter subunit" refers to a member
of a complex of two or more subunits which are capable of associating with low binding
affinity with each other to generate a detectable signal, or which are capable of
associating with each other and one or more additional substances to generate a
detectable signal, and which do not individually generate the detectable signal.
The detectable signal thus provides an indication that
the subunits have become associated. In general, in an assay of the binding affinity
of a first and at least a second molecular species (the "putative binding moiety"),
a first component is provided which includes one reporter subunit attached to the
first molecular species, and a second component is provided which includes another
of the same or different reporter subunit attached to the second molecular species.
The reporter subunits preferably have sufficiently low binding affinity for each
other such that they substantially do not associate with each other in solution
unless and until the molecules for which binding affinity is being assayed have
sufficient binding affinity to mediate complex formation between the two components.
Upon binding of the binding moieties and resulting association of the reporter subunits,
generally by non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic
interactions, for example, the reporter subunits are oriented close enough to each
other such that they are capable of associating with low affinity and generating
a detectable signal. In the system, individual reporter subunits are not able to
generate the detectable signal. Thus, the reporter subunits undergo forced complementation
when brought into close proximity.
The reporter subunits can be designed to have a preferred
low affinity for a particular application and for the conditions in which the binding
assay is done. Binding of molecules will depend upon factors in solution such as
pH, ionic strength, concentration of components of the assay, and temperature. In
the binding assays using reporter systems described herein, the binding affinity
of the reporter subunits should be low enough to permit forced complementation.
Non-limiting examples of dissociation constants of the reporter subunits in an assay
solution, such as a buffered system or cell interior, are on the order of greater
than about 10-8 M for example, greater than 10-6 M or optionally,
between about 10-2 to 10-5 M depending upon the properties
of the particular assay system.
Reporter subunits which have sufficiently low binding affinity,
and yet are still capable of associating and generating a detectable signal upon
the binding of molecular species attached to them can be designed as disclosed herein.
Reporter subunits which can be used include any low binding affinity subunits which
are capable of associating to produce a detectable signal. In one preferred embodiment,
the reporter subunits are proteins which are capable of associating and are capable
when associated of catalyzing a reaction which produces a directly or indirectly
detectable product.
Protein enzymes capable of catalyzing conversion of a substrate
to a detectable reaction product, either directly or indirectly, which have been
used, for example, in cell based screening assays may be used as reporter subunits.
The enzymes can be modified into reporter subunits and to have a low binding affinity
and the ability to undergo forced complementation. These may be modified, for example,
by site directed or random mutagenesis, or deletion mutation, to provide low affinity
subunits which are capable of associating with low binding affinity and thereby
undergo complementation to catalyze an enzymatic reaction. For example, reporter
subunits capable of complementation with low binding affinity may be derived from
enzymes such as &bgr;-galactosidase, &bgr;-glucuronidase (GUS), &bgr;-lactamase,
alkaline phosphatase, peroxidase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and luciferase.
Any of a range of enzymes capable of producing a detectable product either directly
or indirectly may be so modified or may occur naturally. Additionally, reporter
subunits may be derived from non-enzymatic molecules. For example, association of
two proteins may generate a unique conformation in one or both of the interacting
proteins that can be recognized by an antibody or other ligand.
&bgr;-galactosidase, which is encoded by the
E. coli lacZ gene, is an enzyme which has been developed in the art
as reporter enzyme. &bgr;-galactosidase activity may be measured by a range of
methods including live-cell flow cytometry and histochemical staining with the chromogenic
substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl &bgr;-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal).
Nolan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci., USA, 85:2603-2607 (1988
); and
Lojda, Z., Enzyme Histochemistry: A Laboratory Manual, Springer, Berlin, (1979
).
Enzyme mutants capable of intracistronic complementation
are especially suitable as reporter subunits. In E. coli, deletions
of either the N or C terminus of &bgr;-gal produce enzyme that is inactive yet
can be complemented by coexpression with a second inactive deletion mutant containing
domains lacking in the first. The N- and C- terminal domains involved in complementation
are known as the &agr; and &ohgr; regions.
Ullmann et al., J. Mol. Biol., 12:918-923 (1965
);
Ullman et al., J. Mol. Biol., 24:339-343 (1967
); and
Ullman et al., J. Mol. Biol., 32:1-13 (1968
). &bgr;-Gal complementation systems in mammalian cells are described
in
Mohler and Blau, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93:12423-12427 (1996
). As described therein, vectors expressing complementing mutants of &bgr;-gal
may be constructed. A naturally occurring lacZ mutation, &Dgr;M15 (
Beckwith, J. Mol. Biol., 8:427-430 (1964
); and
Prentki, Gene, 122:231-232 (1992
) and
Nature, 369:761-766 (1994
), designated as &Dgr;&agr; herein may be constructed. Another deletion
mutation, designated &Dgr;&ohgr; herein, was made as disclosed herein, and its
structure is shown schematically in Figure 1. The peptide region between the &agr;
and &ohgr; regions is referred to herein as the µ region, as first defined
by
Mohler and Blau, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93:12423-12427 (1996
). The &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr; mutants are demonstrated herein
to have optimal forced complementation properties. These deletion mutants express
polypeptides representing an &agr;-acceptor/&ohgr;-donor (&Dgr;&agr;) and
an &agr;-donor/&ohgr;-acceptor (&Dgr;&ohgr;).
&bgr;-Gal complementation is based on the ability of
mutant enzyme molecules to associate and reconstitute an active enzyme. Accordingly,
two &bgr;-gal molecules that each lack one or more structural domains critical
to the activity of the holoenzyme, associate to form a single functional unit that
contains all of the required structural determinants. This phenomenon is dependent
on the fact that interactions that would normally take place between domains of
the single peptide of wild type &bgr;-gal, can also exist between domains present
on two distinct peptides, leading to the formation of a stable dimer. This dimer
behaves functionally as a single peptide of wild type &bgr;-gal, and participates
ultimately in the formation of the tetramer that represents the active form of the
enzyme. Thus, the ability of a pair of &bgr;-gal mutants to recreate an active
form of the enzyme is strongly dependent on their ability to form a stable dimer
and therefore would be expected to be dependent on their affinity for each other.
Surprisingly, it has been discovered that forced association
or complementation of two distinct low affinity &bgr;-gal mutants results in an
efficient formation of active enzyme molecules in mammalian cells even though they
have relatively low affinity for each other. The forced complementation results
when the two mutant subunits are brought into association due to the binding affinity
of the binding moieties attached to the mutant subunits. By engineering constructs
in which domains or proteins of interest drive the dimerization between &Dgr;&agr;
and &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal mutants, it is possible to monitor and quantitate
such interactions by assessing the efficiency of complementation obtained by coexpression
of these fusion proteins in intact eucaryotic cells.
In addition to two-component complementation between &Dgr;&agr;
and &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal mutants, the invention also contemplates three-component
complementation among mutants each of which contains only a single functional &agr;,
µ, or &ohgr; region. Among other applications, this might allow detection
of interactions among three distinct proteins based on a single reporter. Similarly,
higher-order systems containing four or more reporter components are within the
scope of the invention.
Using the fused protein systems, protein-protein interactions
and their regulation can be studied in mammalian cells without relying on the transcriptional
activation of a reporter construct. Association of the proteins of interest directly
results in enzyme activity and is independent from other cellular functions. Therefore
this system allows the detection of complexes that are excluded from the nucleus,
or that involve partners that inhibit transcription. Furthermore it allows the detection,
quantitation and determination of the localization of specific binding interactions
within cells, as well as the temporal distribution of such binding interactions.
Binding interactions may be compared in cells at different stages of development
or differentiation, as well as in normal vs. pathologic cells and in infected vs.
uninfected cells, to give but a few examples. Binding interactions can therefore
be assessed against a background of endogenous competing components that may differ
in nature and in concentration among different cell types.
Other enzymes may be identified or constructed which are
capable of forced complementation in the reporter systems described herein. For
example, the phenomenon of intracistronic complementation of enzymatic activity
has been described for tryptophan synthetase.
Jackson et al. J. Biol. Chem., 244:4539-4546 (1969
). Complementation between mutant subunits of thymidylate synthase has
been described.
Pookanjanatavip et al., Biochemistry 31:10303-10309 (1992
). Thus, reporter subunits derived from any complementing enzyme system
known in the art can be used in the practice of the present invention. Mutants can
be derived from other enzymes or proteins that are capable of serving as reporters
of protein-protein interactions, or whose activity can be regulated as described
above. The system exploits the complementation ability of low binding affinity enzyme
mutants for detection of protein-protein interactions.
For example, complementing low affinity reporter subunits
derived from &bgr;-lactamase can be constructed. Activity of the complementing
&bgr;-lactamase can be detected using substrates for &bgr;-lactamase developed
in the art which include a fluorescent donor moiety and a quencher, which include
an attached group which makes them permeable through cell membranes, wherein the
attached group is hydrolyzed off after the substrate enters the cell. Fluorescence
energy transfer between the donor and quencher then can be monitored as an indicator
of &bgr;-lactamase activity, as described in PCT
WO 96/30540 published October 3, 1996
.
In addition to enzymes which catalyze a reaction to produce
a detectable product, proteins, protein domains or protein fragments which are themselves
detectable upon association can be used. Exemplary proteins include green fluorescent
proteins, which have characteristic detectable emission spectra, and have been modified
to alter their emission spectra, as described in
PCT WO 96/23810
. Fusions of green fluorescent proteins with other proteins, and DNA sequences
encoding the fusion proteins which are expressed in cells are described in
PCT WO 95/07463
.
Other exemplary subunits include subunits which are capable
of associating to produce a photochemical signal such as a fluorescent or luminescent
signal, including chemiluminescent or photoluminescent signals. The reporter subunits
also may comprise fluorophores which are capable of detectable resonance energy
transfer when they are closely associated, as disclosed, for example, in
EP Publication No. 0 601 889 A2
and
PCT WO 96/41166
.
Other complementing enzymes are known in the art, for example,
pancreatic ribonuclease and Staphylococcal nuclease. Mutants of the complementing
subunits of these enzymes can be constructed, by methods well-known to those of
skill in the art such as site-directed mutagenesis, to generate low-affinity complementing
subunits. One possible use for these types of complementing protein is as a tumor
therapeutic, wherein a tumor-specific protein serves as a bridge to bring together
two proteins, each of which is fused to a low-affinity complementing fragment of
the nuclease. The resultant nuclease activity might, in some cases, kill the cell
by destroying mRNA, genomic DNA, etc.
Binding Moieties
Binding moieties which can be assayed for their binding
affinity with each other include any molecules capable of a binding interaction.
The binding interaction between the two or more binding moieties may be either direct
or in the form of a complex with one or more additional binding species, such as
charged ions or molecules, ligands or macromolecules.
The binding moieties which are attached to the reporter
subunit can be any of a range of different molecules including carbohydrates, lipids,
proteins, and nucleic acids, as well as portions, polymers and analogues thereof,
provided they are capable of being linked to the reporter subunit. Exemplary proteins
include members of a signal transduction cascade, proteins regulating apoptosis,
proteins that regulate progression of the cell-cycle or development of tumors, transcriptional
regulatory proteins, translational regulatory proteins, proteins that affect cell
interactions, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), ligand-receptor pairs, proteins that
participate in the folding of other proteins, and proteins involved in targeting
to particular intracellular compartments, such as the Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic
reticulum, ribosomes, chloroplasts and mitochondria.
Other exemplary proteins include protein hormones and cytokines.
Cytokines include those involved in signal transduction, such as interferons, chemokines,
and hematopoietic growth factors. Other exemplary proteins include interleukins,
lymphotoxin, transforming growth factors-&agr; and &bgr;, and macrophage and
granulocyte colony stimulating factors. Other proteins include intracellular enzymes
such as protein kinases, phosphatases and synthases.
Exemplary proteins involved in apoptosis include tumor
necrosis factor (TNF), Fas ligand, interleukin-1&bgr; converting enzyme (ICE)
proteases, and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Proteins involved
in the cell cycle include deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerases, proliferating
cell nuclear antigen, telomerase, cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases, tumor suppressors
and phosphatases. Proteins involved in transcription and translation include ribonucleic
acid (RNA) polymerases, transcription factors, enhancer-binding proteins and ribosomal
proteins. Proteins involved in cellular interactions such as cell-to-cell signaling
include receptor proteins, and peptide hormones or their enhancing or inhibitory
mimics.
Binding of molecules will depend upon factors in solution
such as pH, ionic strength, concentration of components of the assay, and temperature.
In the binding assays using reporter systems described herein, the binding affinity
of the binding moieties should be high enough to permit forced complementation between
the reporter subunits. Non-limiting examples of dissociation constants of the binding
moieties in an assay solution, such as a buffered system or cell interior, are on
the order of less than about 10-8 M, for example, less than about 10-9
M, or optionally, between about 10-9 to 10-12M, depending
upon the properties of the particular assay system.
Linking of the Reporter Subunit and the Binding Moiety
The reporter subunit and one or more binding moieties are
generally linked either directly or via a linker, and are generally linked by a
covalent linkage. For example, when the reporter subunit and the binding moiety
are proteins, they may be linked by methods known in the art for linking peptides.
In one preferred embodiment, the reporter subunit and the
binding moiety comprise a fusion protein including the reporter subunit which is
a low binding affinity enzyme complement and the binding moiety being assayed. The
fusion protein can thus be expressed from an encoding nucleic acid intracellularly.
This system is advantageous since it permits the detection and quantitation of protein-protein
interactions in cells, such as mammalian cells, based on enzymatic complementation
of the low affinity reporter subunits.
For example, in the embodiment wherein chimeric fused proteins
are produced intracellularly that include one of two complementing low affinity
&bgr;-gal mutants and a "test" protein of interest, the detected &bgr;-gal activity
due to interactions between two chimeric proteins of interest will be proportional
to the strength of the interaction of the non-&bgr;-gal protein components. Thus,
the interaction is driven by the test proteins of interest, not the complementing
mutants. The enzymatic activity serves as an indicator of that interaction. Another
advantage of this system is that only low levels of expression of the test proteins
are required to detect binding.
The fusion gene constructs preferably are constructed and
transformed into cells to produce low level expression. The system then permits
the monitoring of interactions in a given cell in the presence of endogenous competing
protein partners, where the fusion protein will function as a "tracer" for the binding/association
reaction. Such a system will not be prone to artifacts arising from overexpression
of introduced proteins. Reduction in expression of fusion gene constructs can be
accomplished by choice of appropriate promoters, ribosome binding sites and other
regulatory elements. For example, fusion gene constructs can be introduced into
vectors in which they lie upstream of an antibiotic resistance gene whose translation
is regulated by the Encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosome entry sequence
(IRES), and which contain a mutation in the splice donor/acceptor sequences upstream
of the ATG sequence responsible for translational initiation of the fusion gene.
This type of construct results in a lower translation efficiency of the first coding
sequence in a bicistronic message, but does not affect translation of the second
(antibiotic resistance) sequence, which is solely dependent on the IRES. As a result
of these reduced levels of expression, the frequency of spontaneous interaction
of reporter subunits, which is concentration-dependent, will be significantly reduced.
Expression of Fusion Proteins
The invention provides fusion proteins between a putative
binding moiety and a low affinity reporter subunit. The putative binding moiety
may comprise any protein or other molecule whose ability to bind to a second molecule
is to be tested. The low affinity reporter subunit may be any molecule wherein the
monomer subunit is inactive, but association of two or more identical or different
monomers restores activity. The activity must be capable of generating a detectable
signal. In a preferred embodiment, the low affinity reporter subunits comprise mutants
of &bgr;-galactosidase capable of complementation with one another.
Fusion proteins comprise a single continuous linear polymer
of amino acids which comprise the full or partial sequence of two or more distinct
proteins. The construction of fusion proteins is well-known in the art. Two or more
amino acids sequences may be joined chemically, for instance, through the intermediacy
of a crosslinking agent. In a preferred embodiment, a fusion protein is generated
by expression of a fusion gene construct in a cell. A fusion gene construct comprises
a single continuous linear polymer of nucleotides which encodes the full or partial
sequences of two or more distinct proteins in the same uninterrupted reading frame.
Fusion gene constructs generally also contain replication origins active in eucaryotic
and/or procaryotic cells and one or more selectable markers encoding, for example,
drug resistance. They may also contain viral packaging signals as well as transcriptional
and/or translational regulatory sequences and RNA processing signals.
The fusion gene constructs of the invention are introduced
into cells to assay for binding between the putative binding moieties encoded by
the fusion gene constructs. The fusion gene constructs may also contain promoters
and other transcriptional and/or translational regulatory sequences that are normally
associated with the gene encoding the putative binding moiety. The fusion gene constructs
may be introduced into cells by any method of nucleic acid transfer known in the
art, including, but not limited to, viral vectors, transformation, co-precipitation,
electroporation, neutral or cationic liposome-mediated transfer, microinjection
or gene gun. Viral vectors include retroviruses, poxviruses, herpesviruses, adenoviruses,
and adeno-associated viruses. Particularly preferred in the present invention are
retroviral vectors, which are capable of stable integration into the genome of the
host cell. For example, retroviral constructs encoding integration and packaging
signals, drug resistance markers and one or more fusion genes of interest are useful
in the practice of the invention.
Different fusion gene constructs encoding unique fusion
proteins may be present on separate nucleic acid molecules or on the same nucleic
acid molecule. Inclusion of different fusion gene constructs on the same nucleic
acid molecule is advantageous, in that uptake of only a single species of nucleic
acid by a cell is sufficient to introduce sequences encoding both putative binding
partners into the cell. By contrast, when different fusion constructs are present
on different nucleic acid molecules, both nucleic acid molecules must be taken up
by a particular cell for the assay to be functional. Thus, problems of cell mosaicism
are avoided when both fusion gene constructs are included on the same nucleic acid
molecule.
The fusion gene constructs or fusion proteins of the invention
may be introduced into cultured cells, animal cells in vivo except in humans,
animal cells ex vivo, or any other type of cell in which it is desired to
study protein-protein interactions.
Assays
The reporter systems disclosed herein may be used to assay
binding interactions of putative binding moieties attached to low affinity reporter
subunits through complementation between the low affinity reporter subunits which
produces a detectable signal. In addition to testing for direct binding interactions
between the putative binding moieties, interactions dependent upon one or more additional
molecules or ions may be evaluated. Further, multi-molecular interactions in living
animal cells can be evaluated, as well as the influence of various drugs, peptides
and pharmaceuticals on these interactions.
In one embodiment, the binding affinity of one or more
putative binding moieties may be measured by providing a reporter system including
one component having one of the moieties bound to a low affinity reporter subunit
and at least one other component including one other putative binding moiety bound
to a second low affinity reporter subunit. The binding moieties may be different
or the same. In the system; the reporter subunits are capable of binding and generating
a detectable signal only if they are brought into proximity by the binding of the
one or more putative binding moieties. The signal can be directly or indirectly
detected and quantitated.
In one embodiment of the invention, protein-protein interactions
can be detected and quantitated. The signal produced by the complementing reporter
subunits can serve as an indicator of binding between the putative binding moieties,
either directly or indirectly via a third substance. Signals which could be detected
include light emission and absorbance. Exemplary signals include chromogenic, fluorescent
and luminescent signals. These signals can be detected and quantitated visually
or through the use of spectrophotometers, fluorimeters, microscopes, scintillation
counters or other instrumentation known in the art.
Binding of components of the reporter systems disclosed
herein will depend upon factors in solution, such as pH, ionic strength, concentration
of components of the assay, and temperature. Assay solutions can be designed and
developed for a particular system. The reporter systems disclosed herein can be
used to conduct assays in solutions, such as buffered cell free solutions, cell
interiors, solutions of cells, solutions of cell lysates, and solutions of cell
fractions, such as nuclear fractions, cytoplasmic fractions, mitochondrial fractions,
and membrane fractions. Methods for preparing assay solutions, such as enzyme assay
solutions, cell extracts, and cell suspensions, known in the art may be used. For
example, physiologically compatible buffers such as phosphate buffered saline may
be used. See for example, the series, Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press, New
York.
In one embodiment, the low affinity reporter subunits are
capable of complementing one another to form an enzymatically active complex that
is capable of catalyzing the conversion of a substrate to a product which is detectable,
either directly or indirectly. In one embodiment, the reporter system can include
two or more components, each of which is a fusion protein, wherein the fusion proteins
each comprise a putative binding protein fused to a low affinity reporter subunit.
Thus, nucleic acids encoding the fusion proteins can be constructed, introduced
into cells and expressed in cells. Alternatively, the bound reporter units or bound
binding moieties can be detecting by detecting the binding of a labeled specific
binding moiety such as an antibody to the bound complex.
In one embodiment, the low affinity reporter subunits may
be complementing subunits of &bgr;-gal. The system may include three or more reporter
subunits all of which are required to associate in order to produce the detectable
signal. Methods for detecting the reaction products of active &bgr;-gal that have
been developed in the art may be used. For example, &bgr;-galactosidase activity
may be measured by a range of methods including live-cell flow cytometry and histochemical
staining with the chromogenic substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl &bgr;-D-galactopyranoside
(X-Gal).
Nolan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 85:2603-2607 (1988
); and
Lojda, Z., Enzyme Histochemistry: A Laboratory Manual, Springer, Berlin, (1979
). Histochemical staining for &bgr;-gal can be achieved by fixation of
cells followed by exposure to X-gal.
Assays for &bgr;-gal activity described in
Mohler and Blau, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 93:12423-12427 (1996
), may be used. In one embodiment, intracellular analyses may be conducted
by fixing cells and staining with the indigogenic substrate X-gal. Fixed cells also
can be analyzed by assaying for &bgr;-gal activity by fluorescence histochemistry
using an azo dye in combination with either X-gal or 5-bromo-6-chloro-3-indolyl
&bgr;-D-galactopyranoside (5-6-X-Gal). A preferred combination is the azo dye
red violet LB (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) and 5-6-X-Gal, referred to as Fluor-X-gal.
For this combination, fluorescence micrographs can be obtained on a fluorescence
microscope using a rhodamine/Texas Red filter set. Use of these substrates allows,
for the first time, &bgr;-gal-dependent fluorescence to be visualized simultaneously
with two or more other fluorescent signals.
Vital substrates for &bgr;-gal, which can be used in
living cells, are also encompassed by the invention. For example, a vital fluorogenic
substrate, resorufin &bgr;-galactoside bis-aminopropyl polyethylene glycol 1900
(RGPEG) has been described.
Minden (1996) BioTechniques 20(1):122-129
. This compound can be delivered to cells by microinjection, electroporation
or a variety of bulk-loading techniques. Once inside a cell, the substrate is unable
to escape through the plasma membrane or by gap junctions. Another vital substrate
that can be used in the practice of the invention is fluorescein di-&bgr;-D-galactopyranoside
(FDG), which is especially well-suited for analysis by fluorescence-activated cell
sorting (FACS) and flow cytometry.
Nolan et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2603-2607
and
Rotman et al. (1963) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 50:1-6
.
&bgr;-gal may also be detected using a chemiluminescence
assay. For example, cells containing &bgr;-gal fusions are lysed in a mixture
of buffers containing Galacton Plus substrate from a Galactolight Plus assay kit
(Tropix, Bedford MA).
Bronstein et al., J. Biolumin. Chemilumin., 4:99-111 (1989
). After addition of Light Emission Accelerator solution, luminescence
is measured in a luminometer or a scintillation counter.
Reporter systems other than &bgr;-gal may also be used
in the practice of the invention. For example, the enzyme &bgr;-glucuronidase
(GUS) can be used as a reporter and chromogenic and fluorogenic GUS substrates have
been developed. The GUS substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl &bgr;-D-glucuronic
acid (X-gluc) can be used in both chromogenic and fluorogenic applications, as follows.
In one method of chromogenic staining, fixed cells are washed in PBS and stained
with 2 mM X-gluc (Molecular Probes, Eugene OR), 10 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6,
0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 M NaPO4.
Fluorogenic staining may be achieved by using a combination of 5-bromo-6-chloro-3-indolyl
&bgr;-D-glucuronic acid (5, 6 X-gluc, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and Fast Red
Violet LB (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). Fixed cells are rinsed with PBS and stained
in 50 µg/ml 5, 6 X-gluc and 100 µg/ml Fast Red Violet LB, then rinsed
in PBS. Fluorescence is detected on a fluorescence microscope adjusted for detection
of rhodamine fluorescence.
In one embodiment of the invention, the reporter subunits
comprise an enzyme and an inhibitor of the enzyme. Preferably, the inhibitor has
a low affinity for the enzyme. In this case, association between the putative binding
moieties is evidenced by inhibition of the activity of the enzyme. Exemplary enzymes
include &bgr;-gal, GUS, &bgr;-lactamase, etc.
While dimeric reporter subunit complexes are discussed
herein by way of example, multimeric reporter subunits also can be used, as can
reporter subunits which are only active in the presence of one or more additional
molecules or atoms. An example of a trimeric reporter subunit system would be one
consisting of a &bgr;-gal &ohgr; donor (such as a &Dgr;&agr;-&Dgr;µ
double mutant), a &bgr;-gal µ donor (such as a &Dgr;&agr;-&Dgr;&ohgr;
double mutant) and a &bgr;-gal &agr; donor (such as a &Dgr;µ-&Dgr;&ohgr;
double mutant), wherein each individual mutant, and any pairwise combination of
two mutants, is enzymatically inactive. Activity would be obtained only if all three
subunits were able to associate with one another. Enzyme reaction products can be
detected using methods available in the art, such as biochemical assay, microscopy,
flow cytometry, light emission or absorption detection, and immunological methods.
The methods disclosed herein enable the detection and quantitation
of binding events in cell lysates, as well as in intact cells. Thus, interactions
between fully folded proteins are detectable, and co-translational expression of
the binding moieties is not necessary for binding to be detected.
In the practice of the invention, the reaction product
may be detected indirectly, for example, through immunological techniques, such
as immunofluorescent labeling.
Protein-protein interactions can be measured in a reporter
system which includes one or more fusion proteins. The fusion proteins each include
a putative binding protein coupled to a low affinity reporter subunit. For intracellular
expression of the fusion proteins, one or more fusion gene constructs are prepared
which include sequences encoding the fusion protein(s). The fusion gene constructs
may be introduced into cells by methods available in the art, including, but not
limited to, viral vectors, transformation, co-precipitation, electroporation, neutral
or cationic liposome-mediated transfer, microinjection or gene gun.
A variety of cell-based assays can be conducted using the
cells containing the fusion gene constructs. Binding of the putative binding moieties
on the fusion proteins expressed in the cells can be confirmed by detecting the
signal produced by the reporter subunits undergoing forced complementation. Thus,
for example, when the reporter subunits are complementing &bgr;-gal subunits,
cells exhibiting &bgr;-gal activity indicate binding between the putative binding
moieties within those cells.
The fusion gene constructs may also contain promoters and
other transcriptional and/or translational regulatory sequences that are normally
associated with the gene encoding the putative binding moiety. This permits the
study of physiologically-relevant levels of the putative binding proteins
in vivo, in contrast to systems in which test proteins are overexpressed.
Further, this permits the study of naturally-occurring changes in levels of binding
activity over time and can reveal the effects of endogenous or exogenous substances
on binding interactions.
The methods and compositions of the invention can also
be used to study other molecules which influence the interaction of two putative
binding partners. Proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, ions,
small molecules, synthetic compounds or other substances (either endogenous to the
cell or exogenously added) may act as either agonists or antagonists of a binding
interaction. By measuring the effect of such molecules on, for example, &bgr;-gal
activity produced by cells containing two or more fusions representing a particular
pair of test proteins, agonist or antagonist activity of such molecules can be determined.
Use of the methods and compositions of the invention will allow high-throughput
assays to be carried out to test for agonists or antagonists of a particular binding
interaction. Such high-throughput assays will be especially valuable in screening
for drugs that influence medically-relevant protein-protein interactions.
Putative binding partners, or putative binding moieties,
as used in the invention, can include molecules which do not normally interact with
each other, but which each interact with a third molecule so that, in the presence
of the third molecule, the putative binding partners are brought together. Thus,
substances which influence an interaction between putative binding partners include
those which stimulate a weak interaction between putative binding partners, as well
as one or more molecules which mediate interaction between molecules which do not
normally interact with each other. In addition, substances which influence an interaction
between putative binding partners can include those which directly or indirectly
affect an upstream event which results in association between the putative binding
partners. For example, if phosphorylation of one of the putative binding partners
endows it with the capacity to associate with another of the putative binding partners;
substances which influence the interaction of the putative binding partners include
those which directly or indirectly affect a kinase activity.
Assays can be developed as disclosed herein to examine
the effect on intermolecular interactions of a variety of compositions including
drugs such as antipyretic and anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, antiarthritics,
antispasmodics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, tranquilizers, antianxiety drugs,
narcotic antagonists, antiparkinsonism agents, cholinergic antagonists, chemotherapeutic
agents, immunosuppressive agents, antiviral agents, parasiticides, appetite suppressants,
antiemetics, antihistamines, antimigraine agents, coronary vasodilators, cerebral
vasodilators, peripheral vasodilators, hormonal agents, contraceptives, antithrombotic
agents, diuretics, antihypertensive agents, cardiovascular drugs, opioids, and vitamins.
Protein-protein interactions mediated by a third molecule
can be detected and quantitated. The kinetics of binding also can be studied. An
example of such a system is described in Examples 1 and 2 below, wherein &bgr;-gal
fusion proteins are used to monitor the rapamycin-mediated interaction of the FKBP12
and FRAP proteins.
Belshaw, P. J. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 4604-4607 (1996
);
Brown et al., Nature 369: 756-758 (1994
);
Chen, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 92:4947-4951 (1995
); and
Choi, J. et al., Science, 273:239-242 (1996
). For example, kinetics of binding can be determined by measuring &bgr;-gal
activity at different times following addition of rapamycin to cultures of cells
expressing fusions of FKBP12 and FRAP to two complementing, low affinity &bgr;-gal
mutants (e.g., &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr;). A dose-response curve
can also be obtained, in which the extent of binding, as measured by &bgr;-gal
activity, is determined as a function of rapamycin concentration.
This assay can be adapted to control for the possible effect
of a protein component on its fusion partner, thereby enabling the study of protein-protein
interactions in a quantitative fashion. In one such control system, tripartite fusion
constructs including a reporter subunit, a binding protein and the protein of interest
are provided. As described below in Example 3, in one embodiment, the fusion protein
includes 1) a &bgr;-gal mutant portion, 2) a FKBP12 or FRAP portion, and 3) a
test protein portion. The most N-terminal component is the test protein, followed
by FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; or FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;. The presence of FKBP12 and FRAP
in these constructs allows rapamycin-mediated dimerization of the fusion proteins.
The absolute values of &bgr;-gal activity obtained by simple co-expression of
a fusion containing a test protein of interest and fusions containing different
potential interacting partners is determined. In parallel samples, &bgr;-gal activity
is measured upon induction of complementation with a fixed amount of rapamycin.
The ratio of &bgr;-gal activity obtained in the absence and the presence of rapamycin
indicates the relative abilities of the different protein pairs to interact with
each other.
A further advantage of the tripartite fusion system is
that the presence of the FKBP12 and FRAP components provides a flexible hinge domain
between the &bgr;-gal mutants and the test protein. This reduces the possibility
of interference between the &bgr;-gal component and the test protein. Furthermore,
it allows direct testing of the functional integrity of the &bgr;-gal components
in the fusions without the need for recloning into more efficient viral vectors.
For example, the tetracycline repressor, tetR, forms homodimers in mammalian
cells with high efficiency.
Hinrichs et al. (1994) Science 264:418-420
. Coexpression of tetR-FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; and tetR-FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;
fusions yielded &bgr;-gal-positive cells, as shown in Example 3, showing that
it is possible to construct functional tripartite fusions, in which dimerization
of the N-terminal peptide component efficiently drives complementation of the C-terminal
mutant &bgr;-gal polypeptides, with the FKBP12 and FRAP components serving as
both internal standards and flexible hinges.
The system may be further tested and compared by constructing
fusions between each &bgr;-gal mutant and the complete coding sequence of MEF2c.
Since MEF2c is known to form homodimers in vivo, coexpression of both &bgr;-gal
mutants fused to MEF2c should result in readily detectable enzymatic activity. MEF2c
mutants that are impaired in their dimerization potential are available and fusion
of one of the mutants to one of the &bgr;-gal mutants can serve as a negative
control to further validate the system.
Molkentin, et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 16:2627-2636 (1996
).
The reporter system can also be designed with controls
to permit the quantitation of the expression level of the &bgr;-gal fusion proteins.
This will make it possible to control for potential differential expression of the
two (or more) fusion proteins. For example, a peptide tag for which well-characterized
monoclonal antibodies are available may be fused in frame at the C-terminus of each
&bgr;-gal mutant. Different tags, such as flag and myc may be used for &Dgr;&agr;
and &Dgr;&ohgr;, to allow differential detection of the two mutants even when
coexpressed in the same cells. In parallel with the determination of &bgr;-gal
activity in the lysates of these cells, an ELISA assay can determine the precise
amount of each &bgr;-gal fusion protein in the same lysates. First, a polyclonal
anti-&bgr;-gal antiserum may be used to immobilize the antigens. Then the monoclonal
antibody directed against the appropriate tag followed by an enzyme-linked anti-mouse
secondary antibody may be used to quantify the amount of the &bgr;-gal fusion
protein of interest. Such an approach, employing well-characterized techniques,
should allow a determination of the expression levels of each fusion protein. This
modification will be useful where the attached tag does not impair the binding of
the protein or the ability of the reporter subunits to complement.
Applications of the Invention
As will be apparent to one of skill in the art, the invention
allows, for the first time, a broad range of studies of multiprotein and other types
of multi-molecular interaction to be carried out quantitatively or qualitatively
in living cells. In what follows, non-limiting examples of different applications
of the invention are provided.
The observation that levels of &bgr;-gal activity in
the presence and absence of forced complementation can be distinguished, both biochemically
(Figure 5) and by FACS (Example 10 and Figure 6), suggests that the methods of the
invention can be used to screen for new binding partner(s) for a given target protein.
In this embodiment, the target protein, fused to a weakly-complementing &bgr;-gal
mutant is stably expressed in a well-characterized cell line. Expression libraries
containing cDNAs fused to a weakly-complementing &bgr;-gal mutant are introduced
into these cells using, for example, retroviral vectors (e.g.,
Kitamura et al., Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9146-9150 (1995
)) or any other means of gene transfer known in the art. Vectors expressing
gene products that interact with the target protein are isolated by identifying
&bgr;-gal-positive clones. An advantage of this system is that the screen can
be carried out in any cell type, regardless of the cell's milieu of endogenous (and
potentially competing) proteins. A further possibility for this type of system is
that the target protein can be localized to a specific cellular compartment, with
the aim of identifying proteins involved in interactions restricted to that particular
location.
The use of fluorescence-activated cell sorting techniques
is particularly well-suited to this embodiment of the invention. For example, &bgr;-gal-positive
cells which contain cDNAs expressing gene products that interact with the target
protein will generate a signal that will allow such cells to be purified by cell-sorting
techniques. Such cDNAs could be delivered, for example, using retroviral vectors
that allow introduction of high complexity cDNA libraries with high infection efficiency.
The assays and methods of the invention can also be carried
out in the presence of extracellular signaling molecules, growth factors or differentiation
factors, peptides, drugs or synthetic analogs, or the like, whose presence or effects
might alter the potential for interaction between two or more given proteins in
a particular cell type.
Detection of molecular interactions, using the methods
and compositions of the invention, is not limited to those occurring in the nucleus,
nor is it limited to intracellular interactions. For instance, interactions involving
surface receptors can be detected in the practice of the invention. In one embodiment,
the invention provides new techniques for detecting ligand-induced dimerization
of surface receptors in living cells. Dimerization, or higher order oligomerization,
of cell surface receptors is often a prerequisite for receptor activation and ensuing
signal transduction. For example, the binding of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to
its receptor stabilizes the dimerization of the receptor and leads to activation
of its tyrosine kinase activity.
Schlessinger et al. (1992) Neuron 9:383-391
;
Ullrich et al. (1990) Cell 61:203 -212
; and
Weiss et al (1997) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:80-86
. Example 11, infra, discloses the use of &bgr;-gal complementation
to monitor membrane receptor dimerization in living cells. For this purpose, the
weakly complementing &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr; deletion mutants of &bgr;-gal
were fused to the extracellular and transmembrane regions of the human EGF receptor
to form a chimeric receptor molecule (see Figure 7A). Deletion of the cytoplasmic
domain of the receptor prevents the internalization and degradation of the receptor
that is normally observed following EGF stimulation of cells (
Livneh et al. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261:12490-12497
), permitting an analysis of receptor dimerization over time in changing
conditions. The results presented in Example 11 demonstrate that this embodiment
of the invention can be used to detect a previously-unrecognized mode of regulation
of EGF receptor signaling, in which EGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity acts as
a feedback inhibitor limiting the dimerization of the receptor.
The practice of the invention is not limited to detection
of interaction between two different molecules. Multimerization of a molecule can
also be detected using the methods and compositions of the invention. In this regard,
Example 11 discloses the detection of receptor dimerization through the practice
of the invention.
By combining the methods and compositions of the invention
with state-of-the-art methods for construction of high-titer, high-complexity cDNA
libraries in retroviruses (e.g.,
Pear et al., (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8392-8396
), it will be possible to identify interaction partners of a specific test
protein in mammalian cells (i.e., perform functional genomics at the protein
level). For this application, construction of cDNA libraries in retroviral vectors
wherein the cDNA coding sequence is fused to a sequence encoding a low affinity
reporter subunit will be used. A sequence encoding a binding protein of interest
will be fused to a low affinity reporter subunit in a first retroviral vector. In
a second series of retroviral vectors, a second complementing low affinity reporter
subunit will be fused to a variety of different proteins that will be tested for
their ability to bind to the protein of interest. Testing will be conducted by co-infection
of cells with the first and one of the series of second retroviral vectors. Those
test proteins which are capable of binding to the protein of interest will allow
detection of a reporter signal in cells in which they are co-expressed with the
protein of interest. This application will also be useful in screening for agonists
and antagonists of medically-relevant protein interactions.
In one embodiment of the invention, cells in which a protein
encoded by one of the series of second vectors is able to interact with the binding
protein of interest encoded by the first vector are detected and isolated by flow
cytometry or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Methods for flow cytometry
and FACS are well-known in the art; e.g.,
Nolan et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 85:2603-2607
;
Webster et al., Exp. Cell Research, 174:252-265 (1988
); and
Parks et al. (1986) in The Handbook of Experimental Immunology, (eds. Weir,
D.M., Herzenberg, L.A., Blackwell, C.C. & Herzenberg, L.A.), Blackwell, Edinburgh,
4th edition, pp. 29.1-29.21
. In this way, clones of cells in which binding occurs can be isolated
and propagated for further study. This aspect is particularly suited for studies
of developmental mechanisms, wherein it is possible to select a population of cells
in which a particular developmentally-relevant interaction has occurred and study
the further development of that cell population, while at the same time, studying
the further development of cells in which the interaction has not occurred, for
comparison. In a similar fashion, the practice of the invention makes it possible
to isolate and/or study the further development of cells exhibiting interactions
involving protein such as transcriptional regulatory proteins, translational regulatory
proteins, DNA replication proteins, mRNA splicing proteins, proteins involved in
signal transduction, proteins involved in cell-cell and cell-substrate adhesion
(for example, cell movement, axon guidance and angiogenesis), oncogene products,
tumor suppressors, proteins involved in cell-cycle control and viral proteins, such
as those involved in regulation of viral replication, virus-host interactions and
virus assembly, and proteins which are subunits, crosslinkers, modifying agents
or molecular motors within the cytoskeleton of cells.
For a given target protein whose gene is capable of being
fused to a low-affinity complementing reporter subunit, it is possible to identify
known and heretofore unknown proteins or other endogenous or extraneous substances
with which it interacts, by using the compositions and methods of the invention.
In like manner, for a sequence which encodes a protein of unknown function, such
as may be obtained from a nucleic acid sequence database, (or a plurality of sequences
such as a cDNA library) the practice of the invention allows one to identify molecules
with which the encoded protein interacts. The identity of the interacting molecule(s)
is likely to provide information with respect to the structure and/or function of
the unknown protein. Thus, the practice of the invention will likely aid in the
identification and characterization of newly-discovered proteins and protein-coding
nucleic acid sequences.
In another aspect of the invention, a shotgun approach
to the identification of protein-protein interactions can be taken by generating
a first set of constructs which will express the encoded products of one cDNA library
fused to a first low-affinity complementing subunit and a second set of constructs
which will express the encoded products of a second (or the same) cDNA library,
fused to a second low-affinity complementing subunit. Co-expression of the two sets
of constructs and selection of cells in which complementation occurs will allow
the isolation of clones and the identification of cDNAs which encode interacting
partners. One or both of the interacting partners may be known; alternatively, both
of the interacting partners may represent heretofore unidentified proteins. If both
partners are known, new information about their binding specificity may be obtained.
If one partner is known, it may provide information on the function of the unknown
binding partner. If neither are known, the observation that they interact may assist
in the eventual identification of one or both of the interacting pair.
The invention may be applied to studies of the mechanisms
that regulate either homo- or hetero-dimerization or multimerization of specific
molecules, including high efficiency screening to identify synthetic or naturally
occurring compounds capable of influencing such dimerization.
The invention can be used for investigations relating to
the localization of specific complexes within intact cells, or intact animals. Types
of cells which can be used are primary or established cell lines and other types
of embryonic, neonatal or adult cells, or transformed cells (for example, spontaneously-
or virally-transformed). These include, but are not limited to fibroblasts, macrophages,
myoblasts, osteoclasts, osteoclasts, hematopoietic cells, neurons, glial cells,
primary B- and T-cells, B- and T-cell lines, chondrocytes, keratinocytes, adipocytes
and hepatocytes.
It is also possible, through practice of the invention,
to devise systems for regulation of enzyme activity by regulating the association
of complementing mutants. This aspect of the invention has potential applications
to human therapy, as a method to regulate the enzyme-driven conversion of pro-drugs
into their active forms.
Processes involving molecular interactions, particularly
protein-protein interactions, which can be studied in the practice of the invention
include, but are not limited to, transcription, translation, replication, mitosis,
growth control, progression and regulation of the cell-cycle, apoptosis, cell-cell,
cell-substratum and cell-ligand interactions, intracellular signal transduction
cascades, oncogenesis, cell lineages, and embryonic development. Examples of cell
ligands include leptin and growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF),
nerve growth factor (NGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and insulin-like
growth factors I and II (IGF-I and IGF-II), transforming growth factors &agr;
and &bgr; (TGF-&agr; and TGF-&bgr;), endorphins and endorphin receptors, prostaglandins
and their receptors, cytokines and their receptors, neurotransmitters and their
receptors, adrenergic receptors, and cholinergic receptors. Receptors which could
interact with ligands include EGF, NGF, and PDGF receptors and leptin receptors.
Analysis of EGF receptor dimerization, using the methods and compositions of the
invention, is provided in Example 11, infra.
Additional interactions that can be studied by the practice
of the invention include interactions involved in cell metabolism and cell structure.
These include, but are not limited to, interactions that are involved in energy
metabolism or which establish or modify the structure of the membranes, cytoplasm,
cytoskeleton, organelles, nuclei, nuclear matrix or chromosomes of cells. Interactions
among constituents of the extracellular matrix, or between constituents of the extracellular
matrix and cells, can also be studied with the methods and compositions of the invention.
The invention will be further understood by the following
non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Preparation and Transfection of Retroviral Construct Encoding
a &bgr;-Galactosidase Reporter System.
A reporter system using &bgr;-galactosidase ("&bgr;-gal")
complementation to evaluate protein-protein interactions was constructed. A well-characterized
protein complex developed by Schreiber was used as a test system to provide the
protein binding moieties.
Belshaw, P. J. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 93: 4604-4607 (1996
);
Brown et al., Nature 369: 756-758 (1994
);
Chen, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci., USA, 92:4947-4951 (1995
); and
Choi, J. et al., Science, 273:239-242 (1996
). In this protein complex, the intracellular rapamycin binding protein,
FK506-binding protein-12 (FKBP12), interacts with intracellular FKBP-rapamycin associated
protein (TRAP) only when rapamycin is present in the culture medium, an interaction
that increases with the dose of rapamycin. Rapamycin is a small, cell-permeable
molecule that binds to the two intracellular proteins via independent determinants.
Since rapamycin is unable to bind two FKBP12 molecules at the same time and FRAP
only binds rapamycin within the FKBP12-rapamycin complex, only heterodimers should
form upon rapamycin treatment.
Ho, S. N. et al., Nature, 382:822-826 (1996
),
The &bgr;-gal system was combined with the FKBP12/FRAP/rapamycin
system as follows. Two different retroviral constructs were produced, each encoding
fusion proteins of the &Dgr;&ohgr; or &Dgr;&agr; &bgr;-gal mutants, and
either FKBP12 or the FKBP-rapamycin binding domain of FRAP, respectively (FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;
and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;).
The &Dgr;&agr; or &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal mutants
were obtained as described in
Mohler and Blau, Proc. Nail. Acad Sci., 93:12423-12427 (1996
).
To fuse the sequences coding for FKBP 12 and the FKBP12-rapamycin
binding domain in frame with &bgr;-gal, an adapter oligonucleotide (CATGGAGCTCGAGAG)
containing an XhoI site was inserted in the NcoI site at the ATG of the &Dgr;&agr;
and &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal mutants described by Mohler and Blau, supra.
Two XhoI-SalI DNA fragments corresponding to amino acids 2025-2114 of human FRAP
and to the complete coding sequence of human FKBP12 were cloned in the XhoI site
of the modified &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr; mutants, generating FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;
and FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;. Conservation of the appropriate reading frame was confirmed
by sequencing for both constructs.
To insert the FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; and FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;
coding sequences in the pWZL-Neo and pWZL-Hygro retroviruses; an adapter oligonucleotide
containing NcoI and BamHI sites (GATCACCATGGACGCGTGGATCCC) was inserted in the BamHI
and XhoI sites of the pWZL vectors. Both the original sites were destroyed by this
insertion. The FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; and FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; coding sequences were
then inserted in the modified pWZL vectors as NcoI-BamHI fragments.
The cDNAs encoding FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;
were inserted into a mouse ecotropic retroviral vector upstream of the hygromycin
resistance or neomycin resistance genes, respectively, as described above. By using
an Encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosomal entry sequence (IRES), introduction
of a single retroviral vector ensured production of a bicistronic mRNA and translation
of both the &Dgr;&agr; -&bgr;-gal-FRAP-protein and the drug selectable hygromycin
protein. A second retroviral vector yielded the &Dgr;&ohgr;-&bgr;-gal-FKBP12
protein and neomycin resistance protein.
For virus production and infection, proviral constructs
were introduced into packaging cells by calcium phosphate transfection. The supernatant
media containing retrovirus from the packaging cells was harvested 24 to 72 hours
after transfection and used to infect C2C12 cells in the presence of 8 µg/mL
polybrene. Singly and doubly infected cells were selected with the appropriate drugs.
Both Geneticin and Hygromycin were used at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml. The
selected cells were expanded as populations for subsequent experiments.
Although the background &bgr;-gal detected with the &Dgr;&agr;
and &Dgr;&ohgr; mutants expressed from MFG retroviral vectors described previously
(
Dhawan et al., Science, 254:1509-1512 (1991
) was relatively low (
Mohler, W. A., & Blau, H. M., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 93:12423-12427 (1996
), it was further reduced by using retroviral vectors with point mutations
that deleted the splice donor/acceptor sequences upstream of the &bgr;-gal ATG
(pWZL). These mutations result in a lower translation efficiency of the first coding
sequence contained in the vector, but do not affect the expression of the selectable
marker, which is solely dependent on the IRES. Using this vector, two-fold less
of the upstream protein was expressed compared to vectors containing the same LTRs
(long terminal repeats) and the wild-type splice donor/acceptor sequences. Such
a reduction in translation reduces the concentration of the fusion protein and consequent
spontaneous interactions of &bgr;-gal mutants irrespective of the test proteins
to which they are fused. As a result, in preliminary experiments, the background
enzyme activity measured by luminometer for &Dgr;&agr; and &Dgr;&ohgr; &bgr;-gal
mutants alone was reduced from low to essentially undetectable.
Infectious viral particles were produced by transient transfection
of each construct shown in Figure 2a into a packaging cell line modified from that
described by
Pear et al., (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 90:8392-8396
by calcium phosphate transfection. The supernatant media containing retrovirus
from the packaging cells was harvested 24 to 72 hours after transfection and used
to infect C2C12 cells in the presence of 8 µg/mL polybrene. C2C12 myoblasts
were infected either singly with each retrovirus alone or simultaneously with both.
All experiments were performed after selection with hygromycin and G418 to ensure
that 100% of the cells contained both constructs. Both Geneticin and hygromycin
were used at a final concentration of 1mg/ml. The selected cells were expanded as
populations for subsequent experiments.
Example 2: Assays of Binding and Activity of the &bgr;-Galactosidase
Reporter System.
Following the addition of rapamycin to the media, the transfected
cells obtained as described in Example 1 were assayed for &bgr;-gal activity.
As shown in Figure 3, C2C12cells expressing both FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;
were tested by exposure to 10 ng/ml rapamycin (Figure 3b) for 12 hr or to no drug
at all (Figure 3a). Only those cells expressing both constructs exhibited &bgr;-gal
activity, readily visualized by X-gal staining of fixed cells (Figure 3b). It is
advantageous that cytoplasmic staining is detectable with this method, in contrast
to prior methods such as the yeast two-hybrid system, which report only nuclear
interactions. X-gal staining was conducted as follows: Cells were fixed 5 minutes
in PBS plus 4% paraformaldehyde and rinsed in PBS prior to staining. Indigogenic
X-gal staining was performed overnight at 37°C in PBS plus 1 mg/mL X-gal, 1
mM MgCl2, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6.
The kinetics of activation of &bgr;-gal upon rapamycin
treatment were determined. C2C 12 cells expressing both fusion proteins were plated
in replicate in 96 well plates. Rapamycin was added to the culture medium, and the
&bgr;-gal activity measured at different time points. For each time point, six
replicate samples were assayed with a sensitive chemiluminescence assay, as described
in
Mohler, W. A., & Blau, H. M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 93:12423-12427
(1996
). In the assay, cells cultured in microtiter plates were lysed
in situ in 50 µL of a 1:3 mixture of lysis and assay buffers containing
Galacton. Plus substrate from the Galactolight Plus assay kit (Tropix, Bedford,
MA). Reactions proceeded for 1 hour at room temperature. After addition of Light
Emission Accelerator solution, luminescence was measured in a scintillation counter.
The results, shown in Figure 4, indicate that the interaction
assays for the fusion proteins are specific, and exhibit similar kinetics and a
comparable dose-response curve to assays of the FKBP12/FRAP/rapamycin protein complex
alone.
Ho, S. N. et al., Nature, 382:822-826 (1996
). Rapamycin induced a 30-fold increase in &bgr;-gal activity within
5 hours. As a control, no rapamycin was added, and no &bgr;-gal activity was detected
above background. As a second control, in cell populations expressing only one of
the two constructs, &bgr;-gal activity did not increase above background when
rapamycin was added.
In Figure 4b, the dose response curve is shown. The activation
of &bgr;-gal was dependent on the dose of rapamycin, which appeared linear over
a range of 0 to 10 ng/ml of the drug. This linearity provides support that &bgr;-gal
enzymatic activity can serve as a reporter to quantitate protein-protein interactions.
The close approximation of both the dose response and the kinetics to that observed
by others (
Ho, S. N. et al., Nature, 382:822-826 (1996
)) suggests that the fusion to &bgr;-gal peptides is not interfering
with the interaction of the FKBP12 and FRAP proteins. Moreover, endogenous FKBP12
and FRAP proteins are ubiquitously expressed and are capable of interacting with
each other or with the fusion proteins in the presence of rapamycin, without generating
&bgr;-gal activity. Detection of &bgr;-gal activity, as shown above, indicates
that productive FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; and FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; dimers will form in
a cellular environment containing competing endogenous proteins, and that the resultant
&bgr;-gal activity reflects the interaction of FRAP and FKBP12-rapamycin Thus,
the &bgr;-gal fusion proteins can be used to monitor the interaction of proteins
in the FKBP12/FRAP/rapamycin complex and in other types of multiprotein complexes.
It is also possible to detect and quantitate binding activity
in cell lysates. As shown in Figure 5, cells expressing both FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;
and FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; fusion proteins were expanded in the absence of rapamycin
and lysed. 100 ng/ml rapamycin was added to half of the samples, and the &bgr;-gal
activity in the treated and untreated lysates was determined immediately (white
bar), after one hour (black bar) or after 3 hours (gray bar). A greater than two-fold
increase in &bgr;-gal activity was observed in the rapamycin-treated lysates one
hour after administration of the drug. In control lysates that were not exposed
to rapamycin, no statistically significant increase in &bgr;-gal activity was
detected. The ability to detect and quantitate protein-protein interactions in cell
lysates using the methods and compositions of the invention indicates that interactions
between mature, fully-folded proteins can be detected and quantitated; co-translational
assembly of complexes in not required for formation of complexes that can be monitored
by &bgr;-gal activity.
Example 3: Tripartite fusions for the quantitation of protein-protein
interactions.
To permit protein interactions to be studied in a quantitative
manner in the system described in the above Examples and to control for effects
on either the binding ability of the binding moiety or the complementing ability
of the reporter subunits resulting from both activities being present in a single
fusion protein, additional modifications were made to monitor the expression of
the components of the system. In the above described system, the &bgr;-gal fusion
proteins will be expressed from the same viral promoter, however, for some proteins,
it is possible that their expression level will be influenced by the specific fusion
partner. In particular, some proteins or domains could affect the stability or conformation
of the &bgr;-gal domain. As a result, differences in the ability of the test proteins
(the putative binding moieties) to complement one another could be observed that
are not based on a physiological mechanism.
In order to avoid these problems, fusions containing three
components (&bgr;-gal mutant, FKBP12 or FRAP, and the test protein) were constructed.
The most N-terminal component is the test protein, followed by FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;
or FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; (see the exemplary system in Figure 2b, where the test protein
portions of the fusion are indicated by X and X'). The presence of the FKBP12 and
FRAP portions allows rapamycin-mediated dimerization of these fusions, and the efficiency
of &bgr;-gal complementation in the presence of rapamycin appears to be dependent
on the FKBP12/FRAP/rapamycin interaction. The absolute values of &bgr;-gal activity
obtained by simple coexpression (in the absence of rapamycin) of fusions containing
a fixed protein of interest and different interacting partners was determined. In
parallel samples, &bgr;-gal activity was measured upon induction of complementation
with a fixed amount of rapamycin. The ratio between the &bgr;-gal activity obtained
in the absence or in the presence of rapamycin indicated the relative ability of
the different protein pairs to interact with each other. An added advantage of this
approach is that the presence of the FKBP 12 and FRAP domains provide a flexible
hinge between the &bgr;-gal mutants and the putative binding moieties that are
being analyzed. This reduces the possibility of interference between &bgr;-gal
and the proteins of interest. Furthermore, it allows direct testing of the functional
integrity of the &bgr;-gal components in the fusions without the need for recloning
into more efficient viral vectors.
Results were obtained with tetR-FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; or
tetR-FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; tripartite fusions (see example in Figure 2b). Coexpression
of these constructs, in which dimerization is driven by the tetracycline repressor
(tetR) protein (
Hinrichs, W. et al., Science, 264:418-420 (1994
)), readily yielded &bgr;-gal positive cells. This indicates that functional
tripartite fusions can be constructed, in which the dimerization of the most N-terminal
peptide component efficiently drives complementation of the C-terminal &bgr;-gal
deletion mutant polypeptides.
Example 4: Dimerization of myogenic regulators using complementing &bgr;-gal
fusion proteins
The &bgr;-gal complementation system is used to assay
for the dimerization and nuclear translocation of HLH proteins (helix-loop-helix
proteins,
Murre et al. (1989) Cell 56:777-783
) including activators of muscle-specific proteins (myoD, myogenin, myf5,
MRF-4), inhibitors of myogenesis (Id, Mtwist, I-mf) and ubiquitous E2A-type proteins
(E47, E12, HEB).
In a first step, a myoD-&Dgr;&agr;-&bgr;-gal (myoD-&Dgr;&agr;)
fusion construct and a E12-&Dgr;&ohgr;-&bgr;-gal (E12-&Dgr;&ohgr;) fusion
construct are engineered in selectable retroviral vectors, as described above for
FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; and FKBP 12-&Dgr;&ohgr;. The two constructs are transduced
into C2C12 myoblasts. Following selection with the appropriate drugs for cells which
express both constructs, &bgr;-gal activity is quantitated using the chemiluminescent
assay described above. &bgr;-gal activity indicates that heterodimerization of
the fusion proteins is occurring in this cell type. If &bgr;-gal activity is detected,
individual cells are analyzed using a fluorescent X-gal stain in order to determine
if the heterodimers are present in the nucleus. Since wild-type &bgr;-gal can
be specifically directed to and detected in the nucleus by inclusion of a nuclear
localization sequence (nls) (
Hughes and Blau, Nature, 345:350-352 (1990
)), activity from the &bgr;-gal hybrid protein may be detected in the
nucleus. Knowledge of the site of localization in the cytoplasm or nucleus will
aid in assessing the function of the protein interactions, e.g. sequestration and
inhibiting activity, or promoting activity. This method permits visualization of
fluorescent markers of myogenesis, such as desmin, and creatine kinase, in correlation
with the localization of &bgr;-gal, using the sensitive Fluor-X-Gal substrate
described above (
Mohler, W. A., & Blau, H. M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 93:12423-12427
(1996
)).
All fusion constructs between myogenic regulators and complementing
&bgr;-gal mutants described in the following sections may be tested in a muscle
cell where heterodimerization of the endogenous myogenic regulator is known to occur.
In addition, the following controls also may be performed. The myoD-&Dgr;&agr;
construct may be contransduced into the cell with FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr;, and the
E12-&Dgr;&ohgr; construct may be cotransduced with FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;. This
combination of constructs should result in no &bgr;-gal activity, unless some
unusual mechanism exists in the particular cell type being tested that enhances
complementation of the weakly complementing &bgr;-gal peptides independent of
heterodimerization of the non-&bgr;-gal parts of the molecule. The FRAP-&Dgr;&agr;
and FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; may also be cotransduced and cells treated with rapamycin
as a positive control for complementation in each cell type. Cells in high serum
medium (growth medium) and cells in low serum medium (differentiation medium) should/will
give different results.
Example 5:
In vivo assay for the effect of growth factors and substrates on heterodimerization
and homodimerization.
Using the constructs described above in Example 4, C2C12
myoblasts are transduced with one of the myogenic HLH fusion constructs and the
E12-&Dgr;&ohgr; construct. Although C2C12 cells will already contain endogenous
myogenic HLH proteins and E12, the chimeric constructs will act as a "tracer" to
measure the extent of heterodimerization. Transduced cells then may be stimulated
to either differentiate or proliferate by changes in serum levels or the addition
of growth factors (TGF-&bgr;, bFGF, IGF-I and IGF-II) in the presence or absence
of substrates such as fibronectin or laminin. &bgr;-gal activity then is measured
as a function of time. Rapid changes in &bgr;-gal activity after growth factor
stimulation may suggest a more direct mechanism of action of a given extracellular
signal on the formation of specific heterodimers. Slower changes may indicate that
the extracellular signal acts indirectly, for example by up-regulating the expression
of a competing factor which can sequester one or both fusion proteins. Changes in
&bgr;-gal activity may be correlated with the expression levels of known inhibitors
of differentiation such as Id proteins, measured by Northern blot in parallel samples.
A comparison of the kinetics of changes in &bgr;-gal activity obtained with each
pair of test proteins in parallel experiments will indicate whether specific MRFs
(muscle regulatory factors,
Yun et al. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:877-879
; and
Cossu et al. (1996) Trends Genet., 12:218-223
) or inhibitors differ in their ability to respond to extracellular signals.
When a growth factor or substrate capable of influencing heterodimer formation (or
nuclear translocation) is identified, the experiments are repeated in other, non-myogenic
cell types. The analysis of the effect of a specific growth factor in different
cell types indicates whether the intracellular components of the corresponding signal
transduction pathway are tissue-specific.
These studies in tissue culture cells permit the relative
affinity and compartmentalization of specific protein partners under conditions
of growth and differentiation, and subsequently in response to known signal transducers,
to be evaluated. The interactions of these factors may be tested in a relevant physiological
background in competition with the prevalent endogenous components present in the
cell at the time. Most analyses of the interactions of myogenic factors performed
thus far have been carried out in vitro, in purified systems, or in yeast (
Benezra et al., Cell, 61:1213-1230 (1990
);
Lassar et al., Cell, 66:305-315 (1991
);
Hu et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 12:1031-1042 (1992
);
Chen et al., Cell, 86:731-741 (1996
); and
Spicer et al., Science, 272:1476-1480 (1996
). The relatively low sensitivity of the biochemical methods used to directly
detect interactions in mammalian cells, such as immunoprecipitation or activation
of a reporter gene construct, required high levels of protein and overexpression
of the construct, usually obtained by transient transfection, levels that could
potentially force an interaction due to increased concentration. The methods disclosed
herein permit protein-protein interactions that are functionally relevant at different
points in the myogenic differentiation pathway to be studied. Clearly, the extracellular
and intracellular milieu determines the stoichiometry and abundance of the these
proteins at different times. As a result, competition of different proteins for
the same dimerization partners, cofactors, and kinases or phosphatases in signal
transduction pathways could have significant effects on which complexes actually
form in intact cells. To assess the nature of such endogenous interactions, low
expression levels are needed in order not to alter the levels inherent to the cell
and characteristic of the "competitive" environment at a given time. Advantageously,
high-level expression of the introduced proteins is not required in the systems
described herein in order to assess the protein-protein interactions of interest.
Indeed, by contrast with transient transfection assays or even most retroviral vectors
with strong promoters and high translation efficiencies, the systems disclosed herein
provide levels that should not perturb the natural endogenous physiological levels
of the proposed test proteins in the cell.
Example 6: Analysis of inhibitory and myogenic HLH proteins in mice.
The heterodimerization of inhibitory and myogenic HLH proteins
in mice may be mapped. Mtwist and I-mf have been shown to inhibit myogenesis in
mammalian tissue culture systems. In addition, they have been proposed to act via
direct physical association with myogenic HLH proteins (
Hebrok et al., Dev. Biol., 165:537-544 (1994
);
Rohwedel et al., Exp. Cell Res., 220:92-100 (1995
);
Chen et al., Cell, 86:731-741 (1996
);
Spicer et al., Science, 272:1476-1480 (1996
)). During embryogenesis, Mtwist is expressed throughout the epithelial
somite and is later excluded from the myotome (
Fuchtbauer, Dev. Dyn., 204:316-322 (1995
); and
Stoetzel et al., Mech. Dev. 51:251-263 (1995
)). Although I-mf expression has not been analyzed at early stages of somitogenesis,
at 11.5 days post-coitum I-mf is highly expressed in the sclerotome but is excluded
from the myotome (
Chen et al., Cell, 86:731-741 (1996
)). Thus, based on their expression domains in the embryo, these factors
are thought to be critical for spatial and temporal restriction of the myogenic
program in early development.
Further support for this hypothesis derives from analyses
of myf5/lacZ embryos in which the myf5 coding region has been targeted and
replaced by lacZ. Using &bgr;-gal as a marker of the myf5 expression pattern,
cells expressing myf5 are detected in the presomitic mesoderm, where Mtwist is also
expressed (
Fuchtbauer, Dev. Dyn., 204:316-322 (1995
); and
Stoetzel et al., Mech. Dev. 51:251-263 (1995
)), long before the onset of myogenesis (
Cossu et al., Trends Genet., 12:218-223 (1996
)). Later in development, myf5 and myoD are co-expressed together with
Mtwist in the somite before the formation of a distinct myotome.
Ott, et al., Development, 111: 1097-1107 (1991
);
Fuchtbauer, Dev. Dyn., 204:316-322 (1995
);
Stoetzel et al., Mech. Dev. 51:251-263 (1995
); and
Cossu et al., Trends Genet., 12:218-223 (1996
)). These cells do not express other detectable myogenic markers (Ott,
et al., 1991). Thus, the reporter systems disclosed herein may be used to determine
if the myf5 and MyoD proteins in these cells are maintained in an inactive state
by interaction with Mtwist and/or I-mf in heterodimers. At subsequent stages of
development, Mtwist and I-mf are expressed in most of the non-myogenic mesoderm,
where the expression of myogenic factors is excluded.
Smith et al., J. Cell Biol., 127:95-105 (1994
);
Fuchtbauer, Dev. Dyn., 204:316-322 (1995
);
Stoetzel et al., Mech. Dev. 51:251-263 (1995
); and
Chen et al., Cell, 86:731-741 (1996
). Possibly Mtwist and I-mf are involved in the creation of a sharp border
between the myotome and the adjacent tissues at this stage.
The reporter systems disclosed herein permit detailed studies
of the interactions between myogenic inhibitors and activators in vivo during
embryonic development which can provide novel insights into the complex process
of patterning during somitogenesis. Such studies are not limited to mice and can
easily be performed in C. elegans, Drosophila, Xenopus, zebrafish and other
experimental organisms. To date, a methodology that allows visualization of protein
complexes in situ in the embryo has not been available. As a result, no definitive
evidence is available as to when and where during embryonic development interactions
of such HLH heterodimers might occur.
Example 7: Detection of HLH heterodimers in mouse embryos
The &bgr;-gal complementation assay is well-suited for
the detection of protein-protein interactions in vivo. Myf5-&Dgr;&agr;,
MyoD-&Dgr;&agr; and Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; fusion proteins may be constructed.
Mediation of &bgr;-gal complementation with these fusion proteins may be tested
in the course of performing the experiments described above. Using well-established
transgenic technology (
Thomas and Capecchi, Nature, 324:34-38 (1986
); and
Capecchi, Science, 244: 1288-1292 (1989
)), mouse lines may be generated in which one of the myf5, MyoD or Mtwist
alleles has been replaced with the corresponding fusion protein. Thus myf5-&Dgr;&agr;,
MyoD-&Dgr;&agr; and Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; fusion proteins will be expressed
under the control of their endogenous promoters. The expression of the test protein
can be verified in these mice. The Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; transgenic mouse may then
be crossed with the myf5-&Dgr;&agr;, and the MyoD-&Dgr;&agr; transgenic
mouse lines, and in each case the offspring may be analyzed in order to identify
those carrying both of the fusion proteins. &bgr;-gal activity should only develop
in those cells of the embryo in which Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; physically associates
with the myf5-&Dgr;&agr; or the MyoD-&Dgr;&agr; fusion proteins. This analysis
allows mapping when and where during embryonic development Mtwist is actually interacting
with myf5 and MyoD to repress the myogenic phenotype.
Example 8: Targeting strategy and engineering of necessary constructs
The myf5-&Dgr;&agr; fusion protein coding sequence
may be inserted into the myf5 locus so that it will be expressed under the control
of the endogenous myf5 regulatory elements. A similar insertion of wild type &bgr;-gal
in the myf5 locus resulting in a fusion with the ATG of myf5 has been shown to reproduce
faithfully the expression pattern of the endogenous gene. The targeting construct
is based on the published myf5/lacZ targeting construct (
Tajbakhsh and Buckingham, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91:747-751 (1994
);
Tajbakhsh et al., Neuron, 13:813-821 (1994
); and
Tajbakhsh et al., Nature 384:266-270 (1996
)), but with the following differences: (1) The fusion protein contains
the complete myf5 coding sequence fused to the &Dgr;&agr; &bgr;-gal. (2) The
fusion protein coding sequence is followed by a neomycin resistance gene flanked
by FRT sites (FLP recombinase targets). This allows G418 selection of ES cells that
have taken up and integrated the targeting construct. (3) A diphtheria toxin expression
cassette is located 5' of the region of homology with the myf5 mouse genomic DNA.
During homologous recombination, strand exchange will occur within the homology
region and as a result the diphtheria toxin expression cassette will be excluded
following integration (
Capecchi, Science, 244: 1288-1292 (1989
)). Clones resulting from random integration rather than homologous recombination
retain diphtheria toxin expression and will be selected against during culture,
because they will die. The surviving clones are characterized by PCR, and the appropriate
integration of the construct in the myf5 genomic locus is confirmed by Southern
blot.
Subsequently, the neomycin selection cassette is removed
using a modified version of a previously described technique (
Fiering et al., Genes Dev., 9:2203-2213 (1995
)). Briefly, a plasmid expressing a bicistronic message containing FLP
recombinase, an Internal Ribosomal Entry Site (IRES) and GFP is transiently transfected
into the ES cell clones. GFP positive cells are clonally sorted using the fluorescence
activated cell sorter (FACS). In these cells, FLP deletes the sequences between
the two FRT sites, and only the &bgr;-gal coding sequence remains in the ES cell
genome. Aliquots of the sorted clones are tested for sensitivity to G418, and in
the sensitive clones the accurate deletion of the neomycin cassette is confirmed
by PCR and Southern blotting. This approach, which eliminates the selectable marker,
avoids interference between the exogenous promoter driving the selectable marker
and the endogenous regulatory sequences as described (
Olson et al., Cell, 85:1-4 (1996
)).
Targeting constructs for MyoD and Mtwist have also been
described (
Rudnicki et al., Cell, 71:383-390 (1992
);
Chen and Behringer, Genes Devel., 9:686-699 (1995
)) and the relevant constructs may be produced for each. Based on these
available reagents, and following the scheme proposed above for the myf5-&Dgr;&agr;
strategy, vectors to target (
Chen and Behringer, Genes Devel., 9:686-699 (1995
)) MyoD-&Dgr;&agr; and Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; fusions into the endogenous
MyoD and Mtwist loci of ES cells may be constructed. In each case, an ES cell line
syngeneic to the available genomic DNA homology regions in the targeting construct
are used, as strain differences are known to reduce the frequency of homologous
recombination. The same FLP-mediated excision methodology used for the myf5 "knock
in" described above is applied to the deletion of the neomycin resistance markers
from the targeted MyoD and Mtwist loci. This "in-out" strategy ensures that the
fusion protein coding regions are under the control of the endogenous regulatory
elements and associated with minimal extraneous flanking DNA sequences.
Example 9: Analysis of the myf5-&Dgr;&agr;/Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; and
MyoD-&Dgr;&agr;/Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; transgenic lines
For each construct, multiple ES cell clones are injected
into blastocysts. The chimeric offspring obtained upon implantation into pseudopregnant
females are tested for germline transmission, and heterozygous mice are obtained.
One critical control in this experiment is to confirm that the expression pattern
of the "knocked-in" fusion proteins faithfully mimics that reported for the corresponding
endogenous factors. For this purpose, a system allowing rapid detection of the fusion
proteins is provided. A transgenic mouse strain expressing a &bgr;-gal mutant
(&Dgr;µ) capable of strong complementation with either &Dgr;&agr; or
&Dgr;&ohgr; is generated. &Dgr;µ is expressed ubiquitously from the strong
chicken &bgr;-actin promoter. MyoD-&Dgr;&agr;, myf5-&Dgr;&agr; and Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr;
transgenic mouse lines are each crossed with the &Dgr;µ transgenic mice.
Since co-expression of any of these fusion proteins with the strongly complementing
&Dgr;µ mutant should result in readily detectable &bgr;-gal activity, it
is thus possible to follow the expression pattern of our fusion proteins by X-gal
staining of the embryos.
The Mtwist-&Dgr;&ohgr; mouse line is crossed with MyoD-&Dgr;&agr;
and myf5-&Dgr;&agr; transgenic mouse lines. As heterozygous mice are used for
these crosses, on average 1/4 of the embryos will be double heterozygotes. These
embryos are analyzed at different time points during development by staining whole
mount preparations and histological sections with X-gal. The sections also are stained
with the more sensitive Fluor-X-Gal fluorescent substrate (
Mohler, W. A., & Blau, H. M., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci., USA, 93:12423-12427 (1996
)), to detect those cells in which the Mtwist-MyoD or the Mtwist-myf5 interaction
is a rare event and the &bgr;-gal signal is consequently lower.
The strength of this approach is that &bgr;-gal activity
should only appear in cells in which the interactions described above take place
in vivo. This approach allows a thorough analysis of the interplay between
inhibitors and activators of myogenesis during development. In particular, it allows
analysis of the correlation between co-expression and a physical interaction of
two proteins as heterodimers in an in vivo setting, the developing mouse
embryo. This is particularly important in the case of factors which, like Mtwist,
are known to be involved in multiple control steps (
Chen and Behringer, Genes Devel., 9:686-699 (1995
)) and are likely to carry out their functions through interaction with
different determination factors.
The use of &bgr;-gal complementation mutants also can
be extended to an analysis of I-mf. I-mf has also been implicated as a negative
regulator of myogenesis in the embryo (
Chen et al., Cell, 86:731-741 (1996
)). Interestingly however, I-mf and Mtwist are co-expressed throughout
most of the somite. It is not clear if their presence in the same cells is merely
an indication of the existence of redundant mechanisms for repressing the activity
of the myogenic HLH regulators or whether the two factors have distinct functions.
In the first case, the prediction would be that both I-mf and Mtwist associate with
the same factors. In the second case, differences and interactions with different
factors should be detectable using our experimental approach.
Example 10: Analysis of protein interactions by Fluorescence.Activated
Cell Sorting (FACS)
The &bgr;-gal activity of a population of C2C12 cells
that were coinfected with FRAP-&Dgr;&agr; and FKBP12-&Dgr;&ohgr; (as described
in Examples 1 and 2) was assayed in the presence and absence of 10 ng/ml rapamycin
by FACS. FACS was carried out according to methods that are well-known in the art,
e.g.,
Nolan et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2603-2607
. Using this assay, increased &bgr;-gal activity was detected in the
majority of cells after 90 minutes of rapamycin treatment (Figure 6A). A range of
expression levels was observed, as evidenced by the breadth of the peak of emission
in the presence and absence of the drug (compare light and dark profiles in Figure
6A). This breadth is presumably due to variable efficiency of expression of each
of the retroviral vectors following integration in the target cell. This inference
is supported by the finding that when the 25% of cells expressing the lowest &